NC president Farooq Abdullah is administrator of the PAGD. Of the 26 chosen individuals from the LAHDCK, 10 are from the NC, eight from the Congress and three from the BJP; there are five Independents. The Ladakh Union Territory organization chooses four individuals to the 30-part LAHDCK.The BJP has pronounced the People’s Alliance for Gupkar Declaration (PAGD) as a “group” that needs “unfamiliar powers to intercede in Jammu and Kashmir”, yet it is offering capacity to the National Conference (NC), one of the principle gatherings of the union, in the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Kargil (LAHDCK).
NC president Farooq Abdullah is administrator of the PAGD. Of the 26 chosen individuals from the LAHDCK, 10 are from the NC, eight from the Congress and three from the BJP; there are five Independents. The Ladakh Union Territory organization assigns four individuals to the 30-part LAHDCK.The BJP has announced the People’s Alliance for Gupkar Declaration (PAGD) as a “posse” that needs “unfamiliar powers to intercede in Jammu and Kashmir”, however it is offering capacity to the National Conference (NC), one of the principle gatherings of the partnership, in the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Kargil (LAHDCK).
NC president Farooq Abdullah is executive of the PAGD. Of the 26 chosen individuals from the LAHDCK, 10 are from the NC, eight from the Congress and three from the BJP; there are five Independents. The Ladakh Union Territory organization designates four individuals to the 30-part LAHDCK.Headed by the NC’s Feroz Khan as Chairman/Chief Executive Councilor, the Hill Council has BJP’s Mohammad Ali Chandan as one of the four other Executive Councilors, with the arrangement of Health, Revenue, Agriculture, Forests, Wildlife, Industrial Training Institute, and Soil Conservation.
The NC and BJP had challenged the Kargil Hill Council races in 2018 all alone, said the BJP’s Executive Councilor, who speaks to the Shargole constituency.The PAGD was officially comprised a month ago as a foundation of seven provincial gatherings that looks for reclamation of the exceptional status of Jammu and Kashmir as it existed before the protected changes of August 5, 2019. Gatherings in the PAGD have reported they will challenge the November 28-December 19 District Development Council (DDC) decisions in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir together.On Tuesday, Home Minister Amit Shah assaulted the union in a progression of tweets: “The Gupkar Gang is going worldwide! They need unfamiliar powers to intercede in Jammu and Kashmir. The Gupkar Gang likewise affronts India’s Tricolor. Do Sonia Ji and Rahul Ji backing such moves of the Gupkar Gang?… Congress and the Gupkar Gang need to take J&K back to the time of dread and disturbance.”
A day sooner, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad had said at a public interview: “Farooq Abdullah has no remorse in looking for the help of China for the reclamation of Article 370… Mehbooba Mufti said she won’t raise the Tricolor except if the J&K banner is reestablished… Does Congress uphold the assertions of Farooq Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti? Congress should tell in the event that they are with the expressed target of the Gupkar Declaration.”Asked about the BJP offering capacity to the NC in the LAHDCK, the BJP’s MP from Ladakh and leader of the gathering’s Ladakh unit, Jamyang Tsering Namgyal, said the BJP was “transparently” in the collusion with the NC, and that it would keep on being that way. “BJP alliance mein hai. Khul ke hai, aagey bhi undeniable rahengey (BJP is in alliance [with NC in Kargil slope council]. We are in it straightforwardly, and will be an undeniable piece of it in future too). Murmur partnership mein hain to hain (That’s the way it is),’’ he said.
The “Kashmir NC” has nothing to do with that gathering’s unit in Kargil, Namgyal said. “In the following Council decisions, the Kargil NC will likewise come to BJP. No other gathering will exist here,” he said. J&K, the MP stated, is a different UT from Ladakh. “There (in J&K) they need to make J&K a state [again] and get back Article 370, yet it isn’t the situation here. Ladakh is against Article 370.’’
Tap To Explore More : The Indian Express
Also Read : EXPLAINED: WHAT HAVE BEEN THE SUPREME COURT’S RECENT OBSERVATIONS ON ARTICLE 32?
