Connect with us

Sports

‘All selectors combined haven’t played half as many matches as Virat Kohli’

Published

on

‘All selectors combined haven’t played half as many matches as Virat Kohli’

The legend of Captain Virat Kohli will go down in history as one of the most controversial and most talked about topics in Indian cricket. Kohli was relieved of his position as the captain of the Indian ODI team. How he was informed about this, and in stark contrast to BCCI President Sourav Ganguly’s version, how the board accepts his decision to resign as the captain of the T20I, which ensures that this is not the final Indian board The ball has heard of this topic.

Kohli mentioned that one and a half hours before the test team was announced to participate in the South Africa Tour on December 8, the selector had notified him about his dismissal of the ODI captain, which sparked another controversy—whether the selector simply notified Kohli Regardless of his opinion is the correct approach.

After weighing this matter, former Indian all-around player Kirti Azad believes that the selection should get in touch with Ganguly about this matter, and should only make a call after getting his approval. Azad believes that obtaining the approval seal from the chairman of the board of directors is a norm that has been followed for many years and is an essential and fruitful practice.

“If this is to be decided by the selector, they should go to the president. Generally speaking, when a team is selected-when I am also a country selector-we will select the team and go to President Azad and tell News18. In the news At the press conference, he will see, well, sign and announce. However, the selected team is always used to go and see. At the press conference, everyone in the conversation, Corley mentioned that he was being told When he was fired as the captain of the Indian ODI, he said to the selectors “OK, very good”, but Azad believed that the star batsman would definitely be injured because of the way he did it. Azad went on to say that although he did not fail Respect the meaning of the chooser, but Corley’s experience of playing cricket is much more than that.

Advertisement

“Obviously, if you want to change any form of captain, you write and inform the president. Willat is not angry, but I think the way he was told has been hurt. So once it goes to Sulaf, he can. I also said it privately, you can understand, I don’t want to say. All the selectors are great guys, but if you take their total number of games, it won’t even be half of what Wirat has played.” The Indian all-rounder pointed out.

Complete News Source : Hindustan Times

Sports

Gambhir acknowledges that his “sole regret in seven years of captaincy” is Suryakumar Yadav: “KKR failed to recognise his potential.”

Published

on

By

Gambhir acknowledges that his “sole regret in seven years of captaincy” is Suryakumar Yadav: “KKR failed to recognise his potential.”

Throughout his incredible career with the Mumbai Indians since 2018, Suryakumar Yadav has become a household name. He has established himself as a vital member of the batting lineup and is seen as the team’s future leader. He was able to establish himself in the Indian white-ball team and get to the top of the IC batting rankings in the format because to his valiant efforts at MI. But before he was let away, Suryakumar was a member of the Kolkata Knight Riders lineup from 2014 to 2017. When former captain Gautam Gambhir reflects on the two IPL titles won by KKR during that time, he named the star player from India his greatest regret.

KKR featured Suryakumar Yadav from 2014 to 2017.

In 2012, Suryakumar began his IPL career with the Mumbai Indians, appearing in just one match before being cut loose the following year. He was signed by KKR in 2014, and he won the championship in his first campaign there. The right-handed batter scored 608 runs in 54 games during his four-year tenure with the team, although the majority of those runs were scored as a lower middle order hitter.

In an interview with Sportskeeda on Monday, Gambhir said that his biggest regret as KKR captain is that he failed to recognise Suryakumar’s ability or his ideal batting position in the lineup.

Finding and showcasing the greatest potential is the responsibility of a leader. If there’s one thing I regret from my seven years as captain, it’s that neither I nor the squad were able to fully utilise Suryakumar Yadav. And combinations were the key to the cause. At No. 3, you may only play one person. As a leader, you also need to consider the other ten players in the starting lineup. Although he was just as excellent at No. 7, he would have been far more effective at No. 3, he said.

Advertisement

Gambhir went on to praise Suruyakumar for being a team player, citing the reason behind his appointment as the team’s vice-captain in 2015.

He was a team player as well. A good player may be anyone, but becoming a team player takes skill. Playing him at No. 6 or 7 or benching him, he was constantly grinning and eager to contribute to the squad. He went on, “That’s why we named him vice captain.”

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending