Connect with us

India Hot Topics

Love jihad’ coined to disturb harmony, says Gehlot; faces flak from BJP

Published

on

Love jihad’ coined to disturb harmony, says Gehlot; faces flak from BJP

Rajasthan chief minister Ashok Gehlot on Friday said “love jihad” is a term “manufactured” by the BJP to disturb communal harmony, provoking a sharp reaction from Union minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat.

In a tweet, Gehlot said marriage is a matter of personal liberty and bringing a law to curb it is unconstitutional.

Hitting back, Shekhawat asked if marriage is a matter of personal liberty “why are the women not free to use their maiden name or religion”.

BJP leaders use the term “love jihad” while alleging that Hindu women face harassment and forced conversion in the name of love and marriage.

Advertisement

BJP governments in Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and Madhya Pradesh have said they are considering enactment of laws to curb such marriages.

But Gehlot said such law will not stand scrutiny in any court.

“Love jihad is a word manufactured by BJP to divide the nation and disturb communal harmony,” the Congress leader tweeted.

“Jihad has no place in love. They are creating an environment in the nation where consenting adults would be at the mercy of state power. Marriage is a personal decision and they are putting curbs on it, which is like snatching away personal liberty,” Gehlot said.

Advertisement

“It seems a ploy to disrupt communal harmony, fuel social conflict and disregard constitutional provisions like the state not discriminating against citizens on any ground,” he added.

Union Jal Shakti minister and prominent BJP leader from Rajasthan Gajendra Singh Shekhawat reacted strongly.

“Dear Ashok ji, Love Jihad is a trap that has thousands of young women believing the marriage is a personal affair, where later it turns out it isn’t. Also, if it is a matter of personal liberty, then why are the women not free to keep their maiden name or religion?” he asked.

“Why are families of girls too forced to accept the other religion? Isn’t religion a matter of personal liberty?” he tweeted. Shekhawat asked if supporting this in the guise of personal freedom was the “new communal agenda” of the Congress.

Advertisement

He charged that “manufacturing terms, riots and hatred is a Congress prerogative”.

The BJP, he said believed in “Sabka Vikas”, or universal development, and will ensure that womenfolk are “not subject to injustice of any kind”

BJP’s Rajasthan president Satish Poonia also targeted Gehlot, claiming that his statement reflected “petty vote bank politics”.

“It is hard to believe that the chief minister will get so rattled by the plight of the Congress nationwide. We all know that marriage in the tradition of India is a religious and socially recognised rite, and is not limited only to freedom of the individual,” he said.

Advertisement

“The manner in which our innocent girls face harassment under the Islamic terror agenda of love jihad is well known,” Poonia said.

“In such a situation, his statement definitely reflects a petty mentality and petty vote bank politics.”

Also Read: BIGG BOSS 14: KAMYA PUNJABI COMPARES KAVITA KAUSHIK TO SIDHARTH SHUKLA, CALLS PAVITRA’S OUTBURST ‘JOKE OF THE SEASON’

Advertisement

Movie

The Madras High Court has granted early screenings of Vijay’s Leo movie from 7 AM, requesting the TN government to resolve any issues.

Published

on

By

The Madras High Court has granted early screenings of Vijay’s Leo movie from 7 AM, requesting the TN government to resolve any issues.

Madras High Court Grants Early Screenings of Vijay’s “Leo” Movie at 7 AM, Urges TN Government to Address Concerns

The Madras High Court has made a landmark decision in favor of the much-anticipated Tamil film “Leo,” starring actor Vijay. In a significant move, the court has granted permission for early screenings of the movie from 7 AM, urging the Tamil Nadu government to swiftly address any issues and facilitate the smooth release of the film. This decision marks a pivotal moment in the realm of Tamil cinema and the entertainment industry at large.

Historical Context:

The Indian film industry, particularly the Tamil film industry, has seen its share of controversies and challenges related to film releases. Issues such as censorship, political disputes, and public sentiment have often played a significant role in shaping the release schedules and screening times for films. Vijay, one of Tamil cinema’s most prominent actors, has been at the center of such controversies in the past. This decision by the Madras High Court is, therefore, particularly noteworthy.

Advertisement

The Ruling:

The Madras High Court’s decision to permit early screenings of “Leo” comes as a response to a plea filed by the film’s producers. The court, while considering the plea, took into account various factors, including the film’s anticipated popularity and the prevailing circumstances. The court emphasized the importance of accommodating the audience’s interests and allowing them to enjoy the film without disruptions.

A Step Towards Normalization:

The court’s decision signifies a positive shift in the film industry, where release dates and screening times are often mired in controversy. By allowing screenings to commence at 7 AM, the court aims to reduce the chances of public unrest and congestion near theaters, especially in the wake of high-profile film releases.

Advertisement

The Role of the Tamil Nadu Government:

The Madras High Court, in its ruling, also called upon the Tamil Nadu government to cooperate in ensuring a seamless release for the film. This cooperation extends to providing necessary security measures to maintain law and order around theaters during the early screenings.

Implications for the Entertainment Industry:

The decision is expected to set a precedent for the release of other highly anticipated films, not just in Tamil cinema but also in the broader Indian film industry. The court’s emphasis on the importance of accommodating the audience’s interests could lead to more flexible screening times for movies in the future.

Advertisement

The Audience’s Perspective:

For moviegoers and fans of Vijay, this decision comes as a welcome relief. They can now look forward to enjoying the film without any undue delays or disruptions, ensuring a memorable cinematic experience.

In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s ruling to allow early screenings of Vijay’s “Leo” at 7 AM while urging the Tamil Nadu government to resolve any issues paves the way for a more audience-centric approach in the film industry. It is a landmark decision that highlights the importance of balancing the interests of filmmakers and the movie-loving public. This judgment is poised to make a positive impact on the release of future films, ushering in a new era of flexibility and convenience for cinema enthusiasts.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

[the_ad id="55117"]

Trending