Connect with us

India Hot Topics

Supreme Court Convicted Prashant Bhushan For Contempt Of Court

Published

on

Supreme Court Convicted Prashant Bhushan For Contempt Of Court

The Supreme Court on Friday blamed senior advocate and activist Prashant Bhushan for contempt of court due to his tweet.

According to the report of Live Law, reading the judgment, Justice BR Gavai said that Prashant Bhushan has ‘grave contempt of court’. Now on August 20, the bench will hear the sentence.

Prashant Bhushan had made two tweets about Chief Justice SA Bobde and the Supreme Court, about which contempt proceedings were going on.

A bench of Justices Arun Mishra, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Krishna Murari reserved their verdict on August 5 after hearing the case.

Advertisement

Advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for Prashant Bhushan, said while clarifying that he had only criticized the judiciary in general and was not affected by any malfeasance.

Dave said that there are many shortcomings in the functioning of the judiciary, due to which Prashant Bhushan was criticized.

In a detailed affidavit submitted regarding the matter, Bhushan had said, “Criticizing the actions of the CJI or CJI successors is not to humiliate the court and diminish its authority.” To believe or suggest that the CJI is the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court is the CJI, weaken the institution of the Supreme Court of India. ‘

Bhushan said that his tweet about the Chief Justice of India riding a motorcycle was to underscore his anguish over an indirect hearing in the Supreme Court for more than three months during which hardly any case was heard .

Advertisement

The affidavit further states that Bhushan’s tweet about the last four Chief Justices of India was his real impression about him and it is his view that the Supreme Court allowed democracy to be destroyed and not such contempt of contempt may be considered.

The affidavit given by Prashant Bhushan states, ‘All the tweets that I have tweeted are such that I have a genuine opinion about the manner and functioning of the Supreme Court in the last years and especially the last four Regarding the role of Chief Justices, their role in curbing the powers of the executive and ensuring that the Supreme Court functions in a transparent and accountable manner, forces them to say that they contributed to the weakening of democracy. ‘

It further states, ‘Freedom of expression and right to criticism include fair and strong criticism of the judiciary. This is not in any way contempt of court or diminishing the dignity of the court. ‘

In a tweet on 27 June, Bhushan played the last four Chief Justice of the Supreme Court – Justices SA Bobde, Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Deepak Mishra and Justice JS Khehar – for the destruction of democracy without a formal emergency in the last six years. Was criticized.

Advertisement

Another contempt proceeding is going on against Prashant Bhushan, in which it is alleged that in an interview given to Tehelka magazine in 2009, he had made unwarranted allegations of corruption on the former judges, which led to contempt of court.

The court has decided to conduct a detailed hearing on this matter.

Prashant Bhushan has been continuously raising issues related to the judiciary and recently he sharply criticized the attitude of the apex court in the case of workers migrating from other states during the Covid-19 epidemic.

Bhushan also gave statements about the treatment being done to the jailed civil rights activists like Varvara Rao and Sudha Bhardwaj, accused in the Bhima-Koregaon case.

Advertisement

News Source: Jurist.Org

Also Read: The Tickets For The World Cup To Be Held In Australia In 2020 Will Also Be Valid In 2021

Movie

The Madras High Court has granted early screenings of Vijay’s Leo movie from 7 AM, requesting the TN government to resolve any issues.

Published

on

By

The Madras High Court has granted early screenings of Vijay’s Leo movie from 7 AM, requesting the TN government to resolve any issues.

Madras High Court Grants Early Screenings of Vijay’s “Leo” Movie at 7 AM, Urges TN Government to Address Concerns

The Madras High Court has made a landmark decision in favor of the much-anticipated Tamil film “Leo,” starring actor Vijay. In a significant move, the court has granted permission for early screenings of the movie from 7 AM, urging the Tamil Nadu government to swiftly address any issues and facilitate the smooth release of the film. This decision marks a pivotal moment in the realm of Tamil cinema and the entertainment industry at large.

Historical Context:

The Indian film industry, particularly the Tamil film industry, has seen its share of controversies and challenges related to film releases. Issues such as censorship, political disputes, and public sentiment have often played a significant role in shaping the release schedules and screening times for films. Vijay, one of Tamil cinema’s most prominent actors, has been at the center of such controversies in the past. This decision by the Madras High Court is, therefore, particularly noteworthy.

Advertisement

The Ruling:

The Madras High Court’s decision to permit early screenings of “Leo” comes as a response to a plea filed by the film’s producers. The court, while considering the plea, took into account various factors, including the film’s anticipated popularity and the prevailing circumstances. The court emphasized the importance of accommodating the audience’s interests and allowing them to enjoy the film without disruptions.

A Step Towards Normalization:

The court’s decision signifies a positive shift in the film industry, where release dates and screening times are often mired in controversy. By allowing screenings to commence at 7 AM, the court aims to reduce the chances of public unrest and congestion near theaters, especially in the wake of high-profile film releases.

Advertisement

The Role of the Tamil Nadu Government:

The Madras High Court, in its ruling, also called upon the Tamil Nadu government to cooperate in ensuring a seamless release for the film. This cooperation extends to providing necessary security measures to maintain law and order around theaters during the early screenings.

Implications for the Entertainment Industry:

The decision is expected to set a precedent for the release of other highly anticipated films, not just in Tamil cinema but also in the broader Indian film industry. The court’s emphasis on the importance of accommodating the audience’s interests could lead to more flexible screening times for movies in the future.

Advertisement

The Audience’s Perspective:

For moviegoers and fans of Vijay, this decision comes as a welcome relief. They can now look forward to enjoying the film without any undue delays or disruptions, ensuring a memorable cinematic experience.

In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s ruling to allow early screenings of Vijay’s “Leo” at 7 AM while urging the Tamil Nadu government to resolve any issues paves the way for a more audience-centric approach in the film industry. It is a landmark decision that highlights the importance of balancing the interests of filmmakers and the movie-loving public. This judgment is poised to make a positive impact on the release of future films, ushering in a new era of flexibility and convenience for cinema enthusiasts.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

[the_ad id="55117"]

Trending