Connect with us

India Hot Topics

Shock And Anger In India After Worst Attack On China Border In Decades

Published

on

Shock And Anger In India After Worst Attack On China Border In Decades

India has reacted with shock and caution to the worst loss of life on its border with China in 60 years, with senior leaders largely silent on the hand-to-hand clashes in the remote, inhospitable Himalayan territory in which at least 20 Indian soldiers died.

Beijing also offered little information about the violence, but state media appeared to acknowledge on Tuesday that it had also led to Chinese casualties.

A day after reports of the first killings in the disputed area emerged, Indian news outlets began naming some of the dead and a clearer picture started to build of what transpired on Monday night on the high, steep ridge lines above the fast-flowing Galwan River in the western Himalayas.

Advertisement

The killings were sparked when a patrol of Indian soldiers unexpectedly encountered Chinese troops in a steep section of the mountainous region they believed the People’s Liberation Army had retreated from, in line with a 6 June disengagement agreement, sources in Delhi said.

The two armies jostled and hand-to-hand fighting broke out – neither side armed in line with decades of tradition supposed to ward off the possibility of escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbours.

Then an Indian commanding officer was pushed, fell from the narrow ridge and plunged to his death in the gorge below.

Reinforcements from the Indian side were summoned from a post about 4km away and eventually about 600 men were fighting with stones, iron rods and other makeshift weapons in near-total darkness for up to six hours, Indian government sources said, with most deaths on both sides occurring from soldiers falling or being knocked from mountain terrain.

Advertisement

The United Nations and US government have expressed concern over the outbreak of violence between Indian and Chinese soldiers on the disputed Himalayan border which saw at least 20 people killed.

UN secretary general, Antonio Guterres urged both sides to exercise “maximum restraint”.

“We are concerned about reports of violence and deaths at the Line of Actual Control between India and China and urge both sides to exercise maximum restraint,” his spokesman said. “We take positive note of reports that the two countries have engaged to de-escalate the situation.

The US state department offered its condolences to the families of the 20 Indian soldiers confirmed to have died, and said it was monitoring the situation closely.

Advertisement

“Both India and China have expressed a desire to de-escalate and we support a peaceful resolution of the current situation,” it said.

Indian media has reported that talks between commanders have been held, and high-level Indian officials were meeting at the ministry of defense, India Today reported.

Indian Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has hit out at the country’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, who is yet to make a public statement. “Why is the PM silent?” he said.

“Enough is enough. We need to know what has happened. How dare China kill our soldiers? How dare they take our land.”

Advertisement

Both countries’ militaries have blamed the other for the conflict.

Beijing has refused to confirm any deaths on its side, but accused India of crossing the border twice and “provoking and attacking Chinese personnel”.

The editor in chief of state-run the Global Times, said he understood there had been Chinese casualties, but the People’s Liberation Army wanted to avoid “stoking public mood” by comparing numbers.

An editorial in the same paper said: “China does not want to turn border issues with India into a confrontation”, before blaming India for “arrogance and recklessness”.

Advertisement

Indian media is also now asking if there was an intelligence failure that led to the Indian patrol encountering the Chinese soldiers.

“Should there have been some kind of heads up or a warning?” said Shiv Aroor, senior editor at India Today.

“These are areas where decisions have to be taken on a dime. It’s a life-and-death situation … you’ve got to be extremely dynamic,” he said.

“I don’t find any reason to believe the Indian army slipped up in this way … a camp that had already been disengaged by the Chinese had already made its way back,” he said.

Advertisement

Both parties have been working towards de-escalation in recent weeks but the loss of life makes the situation even more complicated and precarious.

Chinese state media has reported the PLA is conducting joint military exercises “aimed at the destruction of key hostile hubs in a high-elevation mountainous region”. The PLA Tibet Military Command conducted live-fire drills with heavy artillery on Tuesday, with reports linking the PLA’s preparedness for high elevation combat to the clashes with India.

News Source: TheGuardian

Also Read: A ‘500 Years Old’ Temple, Submerged In The Mahanadi In Odisha, Is 60 Feet In Height. 

Advertisement

Waqf row

Waqf row: Can’t stay law made by Parliament when validity presumed, Centre tells SC

Published

on

By

Waqf row: Can’t stay law made by Parliament when validity presumed, Centre tells SC

The Centre has sought the Supreme Court to dismiss pleas challenging the validity of the Waqf Act, 2025, stating that there cannot be a “blanket stay” on the law due to a “presumption of its constitutionality.” The government defended the law, claiming that after 2013, there were over 20 lakh hectares of waqf land added. The affidavit also claimed misuse of earlier provisions to.

The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a petition filed by NGO Abhinav Bharat Congress, which sought the apex court’s powers under Article 142 of the Indian Constitution to be granted to the high courts. The Supreme Court has previously exercised its power under Article 142 in the case brought by the Tamil Nadu government against state governor RN Ravi

Advertisement

The Supreme Court has stated that the amendments were undertaken after a comprehensive, in-depth and analytical study by a parliamentary panel having members from major political parties. The government has acted within its domain to ensure that religious endowments like waqf are managed in a manner that upholds the trust reposed in them by the faithful society.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna is slated to hear the matter on May 5 on passing of interim orders. The Supreme Court has also rejected a plea seeking Article 142 powers for high courts, which requires an amendment to the Constitution. The court has encroach upon private and government properties. stated that the power conferred under Article 142 of the Constitution is only on this court and not the high courts.

At large, without trespassing on religious autonomy. The law, the Centre said, was valid and result of a lawful exercise of legislative power ​In a significant legal development, the Indian government has urged the Supreme Court to dismiss petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The Centre emphasized that laws enacted by.

Parliament carry a presumption of constitutionality and should not be subjected to a blanket stay without thorough judicial scrutiny The government’s stance was articulated in a comprehensive 1,332-page preliminary counter-affidavit filed by the Ministry of Minority Affairs. The affidavit defended the amendments as a lawful exercise of legislative power.

Advertisement

A central point of contention in the petitions is the inclusion of non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards and the provision concerning ‘waqf by user’. The Centre argued that the inclusion of up to two non-Muslim members among the 22 members of the Waqf Council and Auqaf Boards is a measure of inclusiveness and does not intrude upon the administration of waqfs asserting.

The Supreme Court, while refraining from granting an interim stay on the Act, has directed the Centre to maintain the status quo. This includes halting new appointments to Waqf Boards and refraining from altering the character of waqf properties, including those registered under ‘waqf by user’, until the next hearing scheduled for May 5 that Parliament acted within its.

The court’s interim order underscores the need for a balanced approach, acknowledging the presumption of constitutionality of parliamentary laws while ensuring that the rights and concerns of all stakeholders are adequately addressed. As the legal proceedings continue, the Supreme Court’s final verdict will have significant implications for the administration of waqf.

Properties and the broader discourse on religious endowments in India domain to ensure the proper management of religious endowments like waqf In response to multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2023, the told the Supreme Court that a law passed by Parliament cannot be stayed merely because its.

Advertisement
  • Group Media Publication
  1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
  2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
  3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/

Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending