Connect with us

Entertainment

After criticising Bigg Boss OTT and asking why they didn’t stop the assignment, Akanksha Puri rips them out for exploiting her kiss with Jad Hadid.

Published

on

After criticising Bigg Boss OTT and asking why they didn’t stop the assignment, Akanksha Puri rips them out for exploiting her kiss with Jad Hadid.

Akanksha Puri Takes a Stand Against Bigg Boss OTT: Criticizing Exploitation and Calling for Accountability

The reality show “Bigg Boss OTT” has been making waves in the entertainment industry, drawing both praise and criticism. Recently, former contestant Akanksha Puri took to social media to express her dissatisfaction with the show, particularly regarding the exploitation of her personal moments, including a kiss with Jad Hadid. In this blog post, we delve into Akanksha Puri’s powerful response, shedding light on the issues of consent and the responsible portrayal of contestants in reality television.

Akanksha Puri’s criticism of “Bigg Boss OTT” stems from her personal experience as a contestant on the show. She raises important questions about the responsibility of the show’s producers and the impact of their decisions on the contestants’ lives. Puri’s concerns revolve around the lack of intervention during sensitive moments, which she believes should have been prevented to protect the dignity and consent of the participants.

Advertisement

One specific incident that Akanksha Puri highlights is the exploitation of her kiss with Jad Hadid, a fellow contestant. She expresses her disappointment at the show’s producers for allowing this intimate moment to be showcased without considering the emotional implications and potential repercussions for the individuals involved. Puri emphasizes the need for ethical boundaries and responsible portrayal of personal moments on reality television.

Consent is a crucial aspect of any personal or intimate interaction, and its significance should not be undermined in reality shows. Akanksha Puri’s critique draws attention to the necessity of obtaining explicit consent from all parties involved before airing any intimate or sensitive content. This ensures that the participants’ boundaries are respected and that their emotional well-being is prioritized.

By speaking out against the exploitation she experienced on “Bigg Boss OTT,” Akanksha Puri is not only shedding light on her personal ordeal but also advocating for change within the reality television industry. She asserts that contestants should not be subjected to humiliation or distress for the sake of entertainment, urging the show’s producers to take responsibility for the content they create and ensure the well-being of their participants.

Akanksha Puri’s courageous stance highlights the need for transparency, respect, and accountability in reality television. Her outspokenness encourages discussions about the ethical treatment of contestants and raises awareness among viewers regarding the potential exploitation that can occur within such shows. Puri’s actions empower others to stand up against unjust practices and demand a more compassionate and responsible approach from reality show producers.

Advertisement

Akanksha Puri’s criticism of “Bigg Boss OTT” and the exploitation she experienced during her time on the show serves as a catalyst for important conversations about consent and the responsible portrayal of contestants in reality television. Her courage in speaking out against the unethical treatment she endured underscores the need for change within the industry. By amplifying her voice, we can hope for increased awareness, accountability, and a commitment to fostering a healthier and more respectful environment for all reality show participants.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Advertisement

Music

NewJeans’ Hanni gets reported as Illegal immigrant to customs amid ADOR contract termination: Report

Published

on

By

NewJeans’ Hanni gets reported as Illegal immigrant to customs amid ADOR contract termination: Report

NewJeans has ended its contract with ADOR, leading to potential legal troubles for member Hanni regarding her visa status.
NewJeans members have recently terminated their contract with their management agency, ADOR, though the agency maintains that the contract remains valid. While the group is now operating independently, at least from their perspective, new troubles are looming. On December 20, 2024, 10Asia reported that NewJeans’ member Hanni was reported as an illegal immigrant to South Korean Customs.

NewJeans’ Hanni reported as an Illegal immigrant

According to the reports, an unidentified individual filed a complaint, demanding her deportation. Hanni holds dual citizenship requiring her to renew her visa in South Korea annually. Earlier, rumors circulated about Hanni’s visa expiring soon. However, ADOR previously stated they were preparing to extend her visa as usual, since they don’t acknowledge the contract termination. This suggests no immediate visa issues for Hanni or the group.

However, the situation has become more complicated since NewJeans publicly announced their contract termination. Legal experts believe that if the group continues to operate independently, Hanni’s visa, which was initially granted through ADOR, could become invalid.

Advertisement

Out of the five members, Daniel has dual citizenship in Korea and Australia, so she’s all good. But Hanni, who holds dual citizenship in Australia and Vietnam, is definitely considered a foreigner and needs to get visa extensions every year.

If Hanni’s contract with Adore was indeed terminated on the 29th of last month, her visa would no longer be valid and she could be considered an illegal resident. Under the Immigration Control Act, she should have left South Korea by the 13th of this month. Since Adore claims the contract is still valid, it’s unlikely they would consent to a visa transfer under the act that allows people to change workplaces without needing a new visa, but the agency they work with must agree to the change.

What is an E6 visa in South Korea?

Foreign entertainers in South Korea typically rely on E-6 visas, sponsored by their management agencies. These visas allow them to work in the country. E6 is typically issued to entertainers, artists, and athletes. However, if the contract with the agency ends, the visa can become invalid.

Since NewJeans has announced its intention to leave ADOR, Hanni may need to find a new agency to sponsor her visa or face the possibility of having to leave South Korea.

Advertisement

Hanni has the option to renew her E-6 visa by signing with a new agency; however, immigration law requires that she obtain approval from her previous agency first. At the same time, HYBE, the parent company of ADOR, has been in conflict with the former CEO of its subsidiary, Min Hee Jin, for several months, which has unfortunately impacted NewJeans. Since ADOR is disputing the termination and pursuing legal action, it is unlikely that they will grant the necessary approval for Hanni’s visa renewal.

South Korean immigration law also requires individuals to apply for a visa change or secure a new contract within 15 days of termination, which has already passed. The last option for Hanni is to leave South Korea and apply for a new E-6 visa abroad.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending