Connect with us

Entertainment

Cruise drugs case: Mere presence cannot prove role in conspiracy, says court

Published

on

Cruise drugs case: Mere presence cannot prove role in conspiracy, says court

When a special court in Mumbai offered bail to two residents of Orissa who were arrested in the October 2 raid, the mere presence of one person on the cruise ship that allegedly recovered drugs from there does not prove that they were conspiring with other defendants.

After the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) raided a cruise ship off the coast of Mumbai and allegedly seized drugs, Avin Sahu and Manish Rajgaria were arrested along with Aryan, the son of actor Shah Rukh Khan, and others. The two were granted bail on Tuesday — the first such order for any of the 20 defendants in the case — but the detailed verdict was announced on Wednesday. The case of Sahu and Rajgaria was also reflected in the bail hearing of Aryan Khan, Arbaaz Merchant and Munmun Dhamecha by the Mumbai High Court on Wednesday.

Merchant’s lawyer, Amit Desai, pointed out that a special NDPS court had granted Sahu and Rajgaria bail and claimed that the charges against their clients were the same. However, in its judgment, the NDPS Special Court stated that the cases involving Sahu and Rajgaria were different because there was no preliminary evidence that they were conspired and abetted.

Advertisement

The court stated that there is no preliminary evidence that they are part of any larger network, and their case can be distinguished from the cases of others who are accused of conspiracy. “The defendant failed to provide any evidence on the record to prove that he had contact with any defendant or had contact with the co-defendant in any way. The prosecution failed to prove the relationship between the applicant and the co-defendant. Conspiracy.

Just because the applicant was on the cruise ship, it cannot be said that he and the accomplice conspired,” Special NDPS Judge Vaibhav Patil ruled. At the bail hearing, the Special Prosecutor Advait Sethna argued that all the arrested defendants (20) are related to each other and clearly stipulated the provisions under Article 28 and Article 29 (punishment for abetment and criminal conspiracy)) of the NDPS Law. offense.

News Source : Hindustan Times

Advertisement

Music

NewJeans’ Hanni gets reported as Illegal immigrant to customs amid ADOR contract termination: Report

Published

on

By

NewJeans’ Hanni gets reported as Illegal immigrant to customs amid ADOR contract termination: Report

NewJeans has ended its contract with ADOR, leading to potential legal troubles for member Hanni regarding her visa status.
NewJeans members have recently terminated their contract with their management agency, ADOR, though the agency maintains that the contract remains valid. While the group is now operating independently, at least from their perspective, new troubles are looming. On December 20, 2024, 10Asia reported that NewJeans’ member Hanni was reported as an illegal immigrant to South Korean Customs.

NewJeans’ Hanni reported as an Illegal immigrant

According to the reports, an unidentified individual filed a complaint, demanding her deportation. Hanni holds dual citizenship requiring her to renew her visa in South Korea annually. Earlier, rumors circulated about Hanni’s visa expiring soon. However, ADOR previously stated they were preparing to extend her visa as usual, since they don’t acknowledge the contract termination. This suggests no immediate visa issues for Hanni or the group.

However, the situation has become more complicated since NewJeans publicly announced their contract termination. Legal experts believe that if the group continues to operate independently, Hanni’s visa, which was initially granted through ADOR, could become invalid.

Advertisement

Out of the five members, Daniel has dual citizenship in Korea and Australia, so she’s all good. But Hanni, who holds dual citizenship in Australia and Vietnam, is definitely considered a foreigner and needs to get visa extensions every year.

If Hanni’s contract with Adore was indeed terminated on the 29th of last month, her visa would no longer be valid and she could be considered an illegal resident. Under the Immigration Control Act, she should have left South Korea by the 13th of this month. Since Adore claims the contract is still valid, it’s unlikely they would consent to a visa transfer under the act that allows people to change workplaces without needing a new visa, but the agency they work with must agree to the change.

What is an E6 visa in South Korea?

Foreign entertainers in South Korea typically rely on E-6 visas, sponsored by their management agencies. These visas allow them to work in the country. E6 is typically issued to entertainers, artists, and athletes. However, if the contract with the agency ends, the visa can become invalid.

Since NewJeans has announced its intention to leave ADOR, Hanni may need to find a new agency to sponsor her visa or face the possibility of having to leave South Korea.

Advertisement

Hanni has the option to renew her E-6 visa by signing with a new agency; however, immigration law requires that she obtain approval from her previous agency first. At the same time, HYBE, the parent company of ADOR, has been in conflict with the former CEO of its subsidiary, Min Hee Jin, for several months, which has unfortunately impacted NewJeans. Since ADOR is disputing the termination and pursuing legal action, it is unlikely that they will grant the necessary approval for Hanni’s visa renewal.

South Korean immigration law also requires individuals to apply for a visa change or secure a new contract within 15 days of termination, which has already passed. The last option for Hanni is to leave South Korea and apply for a new E-6 visa abroad.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending