Connect with us

Delhi

Delhi HC to deliver verdict on Air India’s plea against reinstatement of pilots

Published

on

Delhi HC to deliver verdict on Air India’s plea against reinstatement of pilots

The Delhi High Court will rule on Friday on a series of requests by Air India in response to a single judge’s order, which instructs the restoration of the positions of more than 40 permanent and contract pilots whose services were terminated last year due to a post-Covid business slowdown. -Cause lockup.

On June 1, the sole judge revoked Air India’s decision to terminate the service of several pilots and refused to accept its resignation.

The court has stated that the replacement wages, including allowances, must be equal to the wages received by serving pilots and comply with government regulations.

Advertisement

The dismissed pilots initially filed a petition with the court in July last year, asking Air India to accept the withdrawal of their request for resignation.

Some pilots initially resigned because of the delayed payment of wages and allowances by Air India.

On August 13, 2020, Air India issued a termination letter to several pilots, including those who wanted to withdraw their resignation, and the pilots subsequently appealed to the High Court. Air India challenged the order of a single judge, arguing that once the pilot resigned, the legal employer-employee relationship was terminated and his resignation was irrevocable.

Tushar Mehta, the deputy attorney-general representing Air India, argued that under applicable laws, the national airline does not need to formally accept the resignation, and the six-month notice period after resignation is only to avoid any difficulties for passengers.

Advertisement

Air India, which was recently sold to Tatas, earlier mentioned financial restrictions and the impact of Covid-19 on the company’s business operations in order to terminate before a single judge.

The judges of the Chamber of Judges Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh have retained their orders on October 29 and will pronounce their verdicts on Friday.

Complete News Source : Hindustan Times

Advertisement

Entertainment.

Will Disney release an episode of Neil Gaiman’s Simpsons? Fans ponder

Published

on

By

Will Disney release an episode of Neil Gaiman’s Simpsons? Fans ponder

Neil Gaiman’s sexual misconduct allegations have reignited discussions about his cameo in The Simpsons episode ‘The Book Job.’
Famed English author Neil Gaiman has been accused of sexual misconduct by eight women, with some alleging violent sexual assault. These accusations first surfaced in the Tortoise Media podcast Master last summer and have been elaborated upon in a recent exposé published by New York Magazine.

While these allegations can hardly be deemed unimportant or unrelated to actual concern, they have also energised quite a debate regarding Gaiman’s previous participation in media, including his cameo on The Simpsons. Especially all fans are pinning Season 23 of the show, which is focused on the story of the episode ‘The Book Job’, including Gaiman.

‘The Book Job’ is a heist theme, fleshed out by Ocean’s 11, in which Homer becomes a part of a team responsible for writing a best-selling, yet worthless, fictional young adult novel. Here, the primary characters of the cartoon are Bart Simpson and Patty, Moe, Principal Skinner, and others. Gaiman is actually an uninvited man who tries to become the author’s consultant and takes the manuscript from them, pretending to be their friend. As a final punch line, he claims he cannot even read.

Advertisement

Gaiman denies any sexual harassment allegations

A similar precedent exists in the case of ‘Stark Raving Dad,’ the Season 3 episode featuring Michael Jackson. That episode was removed from circulation after allegations against Jackson gained renewed attention. Al Jean, a longtime Simpsons showrunner, explained to The Daily Beast in 2019 that Jackson’s episode was particularly problematic due to rumours that the singer used his guest role to “groom boys.”

However, there are notable differences between the two cases. Jackson’s alleged actions were directly tied to his appearance on the show, as his guest role was central to the plot. In contrast, Gaiman’s role in ‘The Book Job’, while substantial for a guest star, is secondary to the episode’s main story.

New York Magazine reports that Gaiman covered his tracks with his public persona and even presented himself as some kind of smiling teddy bear who is harmless. This persona is on full display in his Simpsons appearance.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending