Sports
Ex-PAK skipper explains logic behind not making Kohli stand-in captain for ODIs
As Rohit Sharma failed to recover from a hamstring injury, the Indian Cricket Control Council (BCCI) appointed KL Rahul as the captain of the upcoming ODI series against South Africa, despite the team’s former white captain Virat Kohli. Although this decision may have attracted people’s attention, the former Pakistan captain Salman Bart welcomed the decision and explained the logic behind it.
In response to a question from a fan on his YouTube channel, Bart explained that with Kohli’s removal last month, it is logical to make a decision for the future and choose a leader, albeit as an alternative. , Who is likely to become the future captain of the Indian team.
“Virat Kohli will not lead this team anymore. And when he no longer serves as captain, they will choose the deputy captain as the substitute captain. He will lead the team in the future and serve as the captain of the IPL team. I don’t understand why they didn’t give him (Rahul) this opportunity,” he said. Bart even pointed out that this is a pattern that the Indian team has followed for a long time, even during MS. Dhoni’s captain, Suresh Raina, Ajinkya Rahane, and then young Kohli players were given the responsibility to lead the team against weaker opponents in the series.
“This is the pattern that Indian cricket has always followed. As long as there is a chance, they will give the young man a chance and let him take the responsibility of testing him. So I think this is a good opportunity for KL Rahul. We even I saw this in the era of MS Dhoni. Whenever India faced a smaller country, he would give the captainship to young people, and the team used to win. So this is their model, I think this is through It’s a good way to give the players the responsibility to judge the players,” Bart said.
Earlier on Friday, BCCI Chief Selection Officer Chetan Sharma explained that Rahul was appointed as the captain in the absence of Rohit because he is the deputy captain and he is being trained as the future leader.
“We treat KL Rahul as a three-format player, he has a good captain experience,” he said in an online media interaction. “He has proven his leadership skills. This is what all the choosers think. When Rohit is not suitable, we think KL is the best person to deal with this. We have good faith in him and we are cultivating him. “
Complete News Source : Hindustan Times
Sports
Gambhir acknowledges that his “sole regret in seven years of captaincy” is Suryakumar Yadav: “KKR failed to recognise his potential.”
Throughout his incredible career with the Mumbai Indians since 2018, Suryakumar Yadav has become a household name. He has established himself as a vital member of the batting lineup and is seen as the team’s future leader. He was able to establish himself in the Indian white-ball team and get to the top of the IC batting rankings in the format because to his valiant efforts at MI. But before he was let away, Suryakumar was a member of the Kolkata Knight Riders lineup from 2014 to 2017. When former captain Gautam Gambhir reflects on the two IPL titles won by KKR during that time, he named the star player from India his greatest regret.
KKR featured Suryakumar Yadav from 2014 to 2017.
In 2012, Suryakumar began his IPL career with the Mumbai Indians, appearing in just one match before being cut loose the following year. He was signed by KKR in 2014, and he won the championship in his first campaign there. The right-handed batter scored 608 runs in 54 games during his four-year tenure with the team, although the majority of those runs were scored as a lower middle order hitter.
In an interview with Sportskeeda on Monday, Gambhir said that his biggest regret as KKR captain is that he failed to recognise Suryakumar’s ability or his ideal batting position in the lineup.
Finding and showcasing the greatest potential is the responsibility of a leader. If there’s one thing I regret from my seven years as captain, it’s that neither I nor the squad were able to fully utilise Suryakumar Yadav. And combinations were the key to the cause. At No. 3, you may only play one person. As a leader, you also need to consider the other ten players in the starting lineup. Although he was just as excellent at No. 7, he would have been far more effective at No. 3, he said.
Gambhir went on to praise Suruyakumar for being a team player, citing the reason behind his appointment as the team’s vice-captain in 2015.
He was a team player as well. A good player may be anyone, but becoming a team player takes skill. Playing him at No. 6 or 7 or benching him, he was constantly grinning and eager to contribute to the squad. He went on, “That’s why we named him vice captain.”
Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in