Trending
‘Firecracker ban not to target any festival, but to protect right to life’: SC
The Supreme Court said on Thursday that the firecracker ban in Delhi and other parts of the country is not aimed at any community or festival, but to protect the right to life of citizens, even if another Supreme Court judge instructs the federal government to take all possible measures to stop burning in countries surrounding the capital. Straw steps.
Justice Shah said at the firecracker ban hearing held by a bench consisting of Justice AS Bopanna: “We are not opposed to any particular community. We are not opposed to any particular festival or celebration. But we cannot allow it. Anyone playing with the right to life of others under the guise of celebration. We want to send a strong message that we are here to protect the basic rights of citizens.” “No one should believe that this or that order is for a particular… This (ban) applies to everyone.
We are not opposed to enjoyment and celebration, but can anyone say that this enjoyment can come at the cost of the lives of others?” The bench asked, adding that it wanted to strictly enforce its ban on firecrackers. In this regard, as firecrackers have become an integral part of the celebration of Diwali (November 4th this year), there have been several links between the ban and restrictions on Hindus.
Meanwhile, also on Thursday, the bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) NV Ramana lamented that people should at least be able to breathe clean air. “We don’t care about your status report and affidavit. Ultimately, people should be able to breathe free, clean air. This is our concern,” the bench told the Attorney General (SG) Tushar Mehta. Mehta represented the central government in a public interest lawsuit filed by a 17-year-old Delhi student Aditya Dubey.
He claimed that he had made substantial progress in reducing the burning of crop residues in Delhi’s neighboring states such as Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh, And war measures are being taken. However, the CJI bench, including Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli, made it clear that these efforts can only be seen when people can breathe freely.
News Source : Hindustan Times
Hollywood
Jennifer Lopez ‘let go of her’ high-heeled ego while working with Ben Affleck
As Jennifer Lopez navigates her separation from Ben Affleck, she prioritizes her career, notably in the film Unstoppable.
Jennifer Lopez has “let go of her ego” to prioritise her career and personal growth as she navigates her separation from Ben Affleck.
The 55-year-old actress and singer, during an interview with Amazon/MGM, opened up about working on the upcoming film Unstoppable, a project she co-starred in while estranged from her husband.
“It was an honour to be a part of Anthony [Robles] and to play Judy,” Jennifer shared. “I approached the role with a complete lack of ego where you have to go in there and have so much respect for the person you are playing because it’s her story.”
“I disappeared, there was no Jennifer, no J. Lo. That person on the screen is just Judy. Luckily, I got to spend time with her and see who she was alone and as a mother.”
ALSO READ| Jennifer Lopez ‘secretly falling in love with bodyguard’ following the split with Ben Affleck
Affleck praises Lopez’s ‘spectacular’ performance
Affleck and Matt Damon produced the film, which tells the inspiring story of 36-year-old wrestler Anthony Robles.
JLo portrays Judy Robles, Anthony’s mother. Affleck also highly praised Jennifer’s performance, calling her “spectacular.”
“Unstoppable is a very different movie than [Small Things Like These], but in a way it’s similarly rooted in the passion of really talented artists,” Ben told Entertainment Toninght just couple of weeks back. “Billy Goldenberg and Jennifer and Don Cheadle and Jharrel and Bobby Cannavale – all of whom were really passionate about this film.”
After reuniting and marrying in 2022, Jennifer filed for divorce in August 2024. Reports of marital struggles, including living separately, surfaced months before the filing.
“He’s focusing on his work and his kids now,” an insider told InTouch Weekly. “Ben already moved out … They’ll never stop loving each other, but she can’t control him, and he can’t change her.”
ALSO READ| Jennifer Lopez gives fresh sneak peek at her lavish $68 million Bel Air mansion
Jennifer told Interview Magazine, “I was thinking about this time in my life, and I’m like, ‘That’s not what I thought it was going to turn out like.’ And then I thought, ‘No, this is exactly where I needed to be.’”
Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
-
india1 month ago
‘My support will be with new J&K govt’: L-G Manoj Sinha ahead of Omar Abdullah’s oath-taking ceremony
-
Politics1 month ago
New BJP government to take oath in Haryana on Oct 17, PM Modi to attend
-
Sports1 month ago
Score for the third day of the first test between India and New Zealand: Ravindra-Southee crushes IND, NZ leads by 299 at lunch
-
TV1 month ago
Prince Narula and Yuvika Chaudhary share first pic with newborn daughter from hospital. See post
-
In News3 weeks ago
SpiceJet announces 8 new flights to connect Jaipur with Varanasi, Amritsar and Ahmedabad
-
Business3 weeks ago
OpenAI buys new domain chat.com for over $15 million, it redirects to ChatGPT
-
World News4 days ago
Who is Harun Abdul-Malik Yener? Florida man arrested over bomb threat to New York Stock Exchange
-
Entertainment.1 month ago
Massive data breach at Game Freak studios reveals shocking new dark Pokemon movie plot