Connect with us

Entertainment

The ‘controversial statement’ made by Asha Parekh on The Kashmir Files: How much cash did they give to Jammu-based Hindus?

Published

on

The ‘controversial statement’ made by Asha Parekh on The Kashmir Files: How much cash did they give to Jammu-based Hindus?

The Kashmir Files,” directed by Vivek Agnihotri, has ignited significant controversy and conversation since its release. The film, which depicts the tragic exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the Kashmir Valley in the late 1980s and early 1990s, has been praised for its portrayal of a forgotten chapter in Indian history while also being criticized for various reasons. Recently, veteran actress Asha Parekh made a controversial statement that added fuel to the ongoing debate surrounding the film. In this blog, we will discuss Asha Parekh’s statement and its implications.

Asha Parekh’s Statement

In a recent interview, Asha Parekh, a well-respected actress in the Indian film industry, made a statement that raised eyebrows and sparked outrage among many. She questioned the financial aid provided to Jammu-based Hindus during their displacement. Her exact words were, “How much cash did they give to Jammu-based Hindus? We don’t know. They must have given them cash. We don’t know how much cash they have been given.”

Advertisement

These words by a seasoned actress like Asha Parekh were met with a flurry of responses from the public, including those who supported her perspective and those who vehemently disagreed.

The Controversy

Asha Parekh’s statement falls into the broader controversy surrounding “The Kashmir Files.” The film, while widely praised for shedding light on the suffering of Kashmiri Pandits during their exodus, has also faced criticism for potentially exacerbating existing communal tensions. Some critics argue that the film paints an entirely one-sided picture of the Kashmir conflict and does not give adequate context to the complex historical and political aspects of the issue. Asha Parekh’s comments further ignited this controversy, as they seemed to imply that the narrative presented in the film may not be entirely impartial.

Implications

Advertisement

Asha Parekh’s statement raises several questions and concerns. Firstly, her comments might be seen as undermining the legitimacy of the pain and suffering endured by Kashmiri Pandits. It’s important to recognize that many families were forcibly displaced from their homes, faced violence, and lost their loved ones during this period. The provision of financial aid to the displaced families was a humanitarian effort to help them rebuild their lives.

Additionally, her comments touch upon the complex issue of the presentation of history in films. While artistic expression should be protected, it’s also crucial for filmmakers to acknowledge the responsibility that comes with depicting sensitive historical events. This controversy underscores the need for filmmakers to approach such subjects with diligence and sensitivity, ensuring that their narratives do not inadvertently fuel discord or misrepresent historical events.

The ‘Controversial Statement’ Made by Asha Parekh on The Kashmir Files: Unpacking the Controversy

Asha Parekh’s statement regarding “The Kashmir Files” has added another layer of complexity to the ongoing debate surrounding the film. It highlights the challenges faced by filmmakers and artists in navigating the fine line between artistic expression and historical representation. As the debate continues, it is essential to approach these conversations with empathy, sensitivity, and an open dialogue that respects the experiences of all individuals affected by historical events. Ultimately, the controversy surrounding “The Kashmir Files” reminds us of the power and responsibility of storytelling in shaping public perceptions and understanding of history.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Advertisement

Music

NewJeans’ Hanni gets reported as Illegal immigrant to customs amid ADOR contract termination: Report

Published

on

By

NewJeans’ Hanni gets reported as Illegal immigrant to customs amid ADOR contract termination: Report

NewJeans has ended its contract with ADOR, leading to potential legal troubles for member Hanni regarding her visa status.
NewJeans members have recently terminated their contract with their management agency, ADOR, though the agency maintains that the contract remains valid. While the group is now operating independently, at least from their perspective, new troubles are looming. On December 20, 2024, 10Asia reported that NewJeans’ member Hanni was reported as an illegal immigrant to South Korean Customs.

NewJeans’ Hanni reported as an Illegal immigrant

According to the reports, an unidentified individual filed a complaint, demanding her deportation. Hanni holds dual citizenship requiring her to renew her visa in South Korea annually. Earlier, rumors circulated about Hanni’s visa expiring soon. However, ADOR previously stated they were preparing to extend her visa as usual, since they don’t acknowledge the contract termination. This suggests no immediate visa issues for Hanni or the group.

However, the situation has become more complicated since NewJeans publicly announced their contract termination. Legal experts believe that if the group continues to operate independently, Hanni’s visa, which was initially granted through ADOR, could become invalid.

Advertisement

Out of the five members, Daniel has dual citizenship in Korea and Australia, so she’s all good. But Hanni, who holds dual citizenship in Australia and Vietnam, is definitely considered a foreigner and needs to get visa extensions every year.

If Hanni’s contract with Adore was indeed terminated on the 29th of last month, her visa would no longer be valid and she could be considered an illegal resident. Under the Immigration Control Act, she should have left South Korea by the 13th of this month. Since Adore claims the contract is still valid, it’s unlikely they would consent to a visa transfer under the act that allows people to change workplaces without needing a new visa, but the agency they work with must agree to the change.

What is an E6 visa in South Korea?

Foreign entertainers in South Korea typically rely on E-6 visas, sponsored by their management agencies. These visas allow them to work in the country. E6 is typically issued to entertainers, artists, and athletes. However, if the contract with the agency ends, the visa can become invalid.

Since NewJeans has announced its intention to leave ADOR, Hanni may need to find a new agency to sponsor her visa or face the possibility of having to leave South Korea.

Advertisement

Hanni has the option to renew her E-6 visa by signing with a new agency; however, immigration law requires that she obtain approval from her previous agency first. At the same time, HYBE, the parent company of ADOR, has been in conflict with the former CEO of its subsidiary, Min Hee Jin, for several months, which has unfortunately impacted NewJeans. Since ADOR is disputing the termination and pursuing legal action, it is unlikely that they will grant the necessary approval for Hanni’s visa renewal.

South Korean immigration law also requires individuals to apply for a visa change or secure a new contract within 15 days of termination, which has already passed. The last option for Hanni is to leave South Korea and apply for a new E-6 visa abroad.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending