In a surprising revelation that has reignited a long-standing debate in Bollywood, director Umesh Shukla has addressed the whispers and controversies surrounding his 2012 satirical film OMG: Oh My God! and the later 2014 film PK, directed by Rajkumar Hirani. In a candid interview, Shukla broke his silence on allegations that producer Vidhu Vinod Chopra offered him a bribe of Rs 8 crore to shelve OMG, a claim that reflects the intense behind-the-scenes politics in the Hindi film industry.

Umesh Shukla, known for his directorial boldness in tackling religious orthodoxy and blind faith through humor and satire, has often been asked about the uncanny thematic similarities between OMG and PK. Both films feature protagonists who question the institutionalization of religion and challenge blind belief systems, although their narrative styles and presentations differ significantly.

According to Shukla, the rumors about a bribe were not just baseless but deeply hurtful. He stated that during the production of OMG, many industry insiders warned him against treading on controversial themes. Some even suggested that powerful people in Bollywood were trying to stall his project by offering financial incentives, but he remained undeterred.

“I had heard that Vidhu Vinod Chopra gave me Rs 8 crore to not make OMG, but that’s completely false,” Shukla asserted, expressing disbelief at how easily such narratives were accepted by the public without verification. He emphasized that the story of OMG was deeply personal to him and born out of his desire to provoke thought through cinema.

The controversy took a sharper turn when PK, starring Aamir Khan, was released just two years after OMG and explored nearly identical themes of questioning religious dogma. While PK took a more fantastical route, introducing an alien protagonist who struggles to understand Earth’s religious customs, OMG kept its storytelling grounded in realism with Paresh Rawal’s character, a shopkeeper who sues God after his shop is destroyed in an earthquake.

Fans and critics quickly drew parallels between the two films, with many suggesting that PK borrowed heavily from OMG. The similarity in central themes and the treatment of religious satire led to accusations of idea theft, sparking a debate about originality and influence in Bollywood.

Shukla’s recent comments have rekindled interest in the timeline of both films. He pointed out that OMG was based on a Gujarati play titled Kanji Virudh Kanji, which itself had been staged long before PK entered production. The play, and by extension OMG, was already well-known among theater circles, making the claims of copying absurd, according to him.

Adding to the complexity, both films featured strong performances and starred powerhouse actors—Paresh Rawal and Akshay Kumar in OMG, and Aamir Khan and Anushka Sharma in PK. The commercial success of both films showed that audiences were hungry for content that questioned norms and dared to speak against blind faith.

Shukla emphasized that no amount of money could have made him abandon a story he believed in so deeply. “You cannot put a price on conviction,” he said, adding that he faced immense challenges during the making of OMG, including threats from fringe groups and legal notices that attempted to ban the film.

The controversy also highlights the power dynamics in Bollywood. While Shukla was working with limited resources and a modest budget, PK enjoyed a massive production scale, international locations, and a superstar at its helm. This disparity made many believe that PK overshadowed OMG, although both films carved their own niches.

In recalling the production journey of OMG, Umesh Shukla shared that it was never a film meant for controversy—it was created to start conversations. He stressed that the core objective was to urge people to think critically about the rituals and traditions they follow blindly, rather than mocking any particular religion or belief system. His conviction was that cinema could be an effective medium to challenge the status quo without inciting hate.

Shukla mentioned that OMG was initially seen as a risky project. Studios were hesitant to back it due to its sensitive subject matter. “Many people told me it wouldn’t get released or would be banned outright,” he said. However, once Akshay Kumar came on board as both producer and actor, the film gained momentum and credibility. Akshay’s support gave the project the push it needed to reach audiences.

The director also explained how important casting was in shaping OMG. Paresh Rawal, who had already portrayed the character Kanji on stage, brought authenticity and depth to the screen version. His performance was lauded for its balance of sarcasm, sincerity, and emotional vulnerability. Shukla credits Rawal’s theatrical experience as the key to humanizing the film’s bold message.

When asked directly about PK, Shukla was diplomatic but firm. He said he has nothing against the film or its makers, but it’s undeniable that the similarities between the two were “too convenient to ignore.” While he avoided accusing anyone outright of plagiarism, he maintained that the creative overlap left him and others with a sense of déjà vu that couldn’t be dismissed.

Another aspect of the conversation was the timeline. Shukla emphasized that OMG had already been conceptualized, written, and nearly completed by the time he heard about PK being in development. This timeline discrepancy, he believes, is why many suspect that the latter may have drawn inspiration from his film. He finds it unfortunate that people in the industry rarely speak up about such matters due to fear of backlash.

Despite the challenges and comparisons, Shukla takes pride in the cultural impact of OMG. He recalled receiving messages from audiences across India, including small towns and conservative regions, thanking him for making a film that gave voice to their doubts and questions. For him, that validation mattered more than box office numbers or critical acclaim.

He also revealed that OMG faced legal hurdles and community protests before and after its release. Certain religious groups filed cases alleging the film was blasphemous. “There were screenings with police protection,” he said. “We had to go to court to defend our right to express ourselves artistically.” He believes those experiences made him stronger as a filmmaker.

Interestingly, Shukla believes that the controversy and comparisons between OMG and PK opened the floodgates for more films to explore philosophical and religious themes without fear. He noted that films like Article 15, Lipstick Under My Burkha, and The Kashmir Files may not have emerged so boldly if earlier projects hadn’t tested the waters.

He further clarified that the rumors about the Rs 8 crore bribe had originated from online gossip and unverified sources, which were then picked up by tabloids. “There’s no truth to it, but once a lie spreads, it’s hard to catch up with it,” he said. “Sometimes I think people want controversy more than the truth.” His tone was not bitter—rather, it carried the resignation of someone who has seen the industry from the inside.

In the years since OMG, Shukla has continued to work on socially relevant content. He directed 102 Not Out, a heartwarming story about aging and father-son relationships, and has continued exploring themes that challenge societal norms. But he admits that OMG remains closest to his heart, both for the message it carried and the battle it took to bring it to the screen.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/