Connect with us

Construction Infrastructure

Cement and concrete makers target net zero emissions by 2050

Published

4 years ago

on

Cement and concrete makers target net zero emissions by 2050

Cement manufacturers around the world have pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by a quarter within this decade and reach net zero emissions by 2050. They say this will have a significant impact on the prospects of the Cop26 climate summit.

This industry accounts for about 7%-8% of global carbon dioxide emissions, which is equivalent to any country except China and the United States. Reducing emissions from cement production is difficult because the chemical processes used to make cement and concrete release carbon dioxide. The Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), which represents the world’s 40 largest manufacturers and approximately 80% of industries outside of China, made its pledge on Tuesday. Several major Chinese cement and concrete companies that account for about 20% of the Chinese market have also joined. For more than ten years, the company has been committed to changing chemical processes and using different materials as well as ways to improve energy efficiency.

Tuesday’s pledge marks the first time a major producer has made a public pledge on climate issues. GCCA CEO Thomas Guillot said: “This is an important milestone-this is a big event. Concrete is the second most commonly used material in the world after water. We are the first department to do so as a joint commitment. , But I hope that more departments will do this, which will inspire more people to do so.” Guillot said that the pledge does not depend on government actions, although the industry prefers countries to set carbon prices and formulate policies to speed up the process.

Advertisement

These companies promise to achieve net zero emissions without offsetting their emissions. This is something that some people in other industries plan to rely on this controversial approach to achieve net zero emissions targets. The reduction in emissions this decade will use existing technologies, but the industry’s 2030-2050 roadmap will require about one-third of the emissions reductions to come from the use of carbon capture and storage technologies that have not yet been widely used commercially. Adair Turner, chairman of the Energy Transition Commission think tank, said that given the nature of the industry, this move is a “big step forward.” “Everyone recognizes that cement and concrete production is one of the most difficult economic activities to decarbonize.

Achieving this goal will require better building design and construction, multiple forms of efficiency improvements, and carbon capture and storage,” he said. The peer said. Mike Childs, head of science at Friends of the Earth, said companies should also try alternatives to concrete. “Switching to cleaner fuels, such as electricity or hydrogen produced from renewable energy sources, can reduce carbon emissions [in cement], and innovation may one day help solve the process emissions problem. So, while these measures are good, But they are not all the answers. We need to reduce the use of cement and make the process cleaner. One way is to switch to wood,” he said.

News Source : The Guardian

Advertisement
Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Omar Slams

Omar slams Pakistan’s ‘neutral’ probe offer on Pahalgam attack: ‘They didn’t even

Published

6 days ago

on

April 26, 2025

By

Omar slams Pakistan’s ‘neutral’ probe offer on Pahalgam attack: ‘They didn’t even

India has suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, closed the Attari check post, and canceled SAARC visas for Pakistan nationals in response to the Pahalgam attack. Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah criticized Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s offer for a “neutral” investigation into the Pahalgam terror attack, stating that Pakistan initially denied incident.

India. Shehbaz Sharif said Pakistan was willing to support a “neutral and transparent” investigation into the killing of 26 people in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam. He emphasized the need for a “grinding halt” to the perpetual blame game and called for Pakistan to tensions participate in any neutral, transparent, and credible investigation. The incident has sparked.

Advertisement

India has taken several steps against Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people. These include suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, closing the Attari Integrated Check Post, and canceling the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES) for Pakistani nationals. The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, has claimed.

Responsibility for the attack. Investigations reveal that Adil Ahmed Thoker, a key suspect in rooted in centuries-old cultural growing tensions between India and Pakistan. the Pahalgam attack, received military training in Pakistan before infiltrating India with other terrorists amid speculation about back-channel mediation by countries with close with India Pakistan.

Amid ongoing tensions, Pakistani troops have resumed unprovoked firing along the Line of Control (LoC), and for the second consecutive night, the Pakistani army targeted Indian positions, prompting a retaliatory response from Indian forces. Iran’s foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi offered to “forge greater understanding” between New Delhi and Islamabad.

Araghchi said that Iran stands ready to use its good offices in Islamabad and New Delhi to forge greater understanding at this difficult time. He described India and Pakistan as “brotherly neighbours of Iran, enjoying relations rooted in centuries-old cultural and civilizational ties” and said that they consider them their foremost priority The recent.

Advertisement

Terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, has stirred strong reactions across the political spectrum, with former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah leading the charge in condemning Pakistan’s response to the incident. Pakistan’s offer of a “neutral” investigation into the attack has sparked outrage, with Omar Abdullah accusing.

The neighboring country of failing to take any meaningful action or even offering a proper condemnation of the attack The Pahalgam attack, which occurred in the popular tourist town in the Kashmir Valley, left multiple civilians injured and sent shockwaves through the region. While the perpetrators of the attack are suspected to be militants operating from across.

The border, Pakistan’s reaction has been criticized for its lack of condemnation and accountability. In response to calls for a thorough investigation into the incident, Pakistan offered to conduct a “neutral” probe, suggesting that an impartial body, rather than which occurred in the popular tourist town authorities in either country, should investigate.

Omar Abdullah, known for his sharp and outspoken criticism of Pakistan’s role in Kashmir, was quick to hit back. “They didn’t even condemn the attack. And now, they want to offer a ‘neutral’ investigation?” he said in a strongly worded statement. “If Pakistan is so concerned about what happened in Pahalgam, why don’t they condemn it first? Why don’t they make it.

Advertisement

Abdullah’s statement reflects the deep frustration felt by many in Jammu and Kashmir, who believe that Pakistan’s offer is nothing more than a distraction from its own involvement in cross-border terrorism. The former Chief Minister further was a deliberate attempt to deflect attention from the fact that the attack.

  • Group Media Publication
  1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
  2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
  3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/

Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending

en Englishhi हिन्दी
en English