Connect with us

Fashion

All change at Bottega Veneta: designer Daniel Lee moves on

Published

on

All change at Bottega Veneta: designer Daniel Lee moves on

Daniel Lee, the designer who is thought to reinvigorate the luxury fashion brand Bottega Veneta, is about to leave the brand. The statement announcing the news stated that it was “a joint decision to end cooperation.” But this is a shock to the fashion industry. Lee joined Bottega Veneta in July 2018, quickly making it one of the most sought-after brands in the world. During his tenure, Rihanna, A$AP Rocky and Mary J Blige all wore designs, and accessories including “pouch” bags and woven leather “Lido” sandals were also highly sought after and imitated. Sales in 2019 increased by 2.2% to nearly 1.2 billion euros (£1 billion) and continued to grow in 2020, despite a 23% decline in other luxury goods markets.

Revenue in the third quarter of 2021 increased by 8.9% year-on-year. The rumor factory in the fashion industry has hinted at various reasons behind the spin-off. Lee previously worked at Celine under the leadership of Phoebe Philo. As Philo’s own brand will debut next year, industry insiders speculate that he might join her. “All theories are welcome,” Diet Prada wrote in the Instagram post announcing the news. “Ours? LVMH has dug him back to work for the brand of the same name that Phoebe Philo has not yet unveiled, haha.” “Women’s Wear Daily” stated that Lee’s way of working has been difficult, and many employees have left Bottega Veneta.

It quoted a source who said: “There is no denying his talent, but on a personal level, dealing with relationships is another matter-considering his working hours, usually at night. So many people left, This is a revolving door.” A speech in Detroit last month, and the pressure to put it together, may have caused Lee to leave the brand. GQ’s style director Teo van den Broeke also speculated that work culture may be the culprit. “Has anything unpleasant happened in the well-ventilated studio of Bottega Veneta’s Via Privata Ercole Marelli headquarters in Milan?” he wrote. “It is possible that we will never know, but there is no doubt that the earthquake happened to facilitate this change at such a rapid rate.”

Lee’s Bottega Veneta uses disruptive communication methods. Bottega Veneta deleted the social media account that is now a luxury brand in early 2021. Although this has been hailed as radical-and has since been copied by other brands-other pivots have not been so successful.

Advertisement

Bottega Veneta did not participate in the digital fashion show during the pandemic, and since then only used invitation-style salon-style presentations in London, Berlin and Detroit. An evening party in Berlin in April-during the city’s lockdown-was criticized on social media. “It’s damn immoral, we are in MF lockdown here in Berlin,” wrote influencer Loona Hamilton.

News Source : The Guardian

Tollywood

Post Kanguva debacle, Tamil Nadu producers demand ban of YouTube channels from theatres

Published

on

By

Post Kanguva debacle, Tamil Nadu producers demand ban of YouTube channels from theatres

This decision comes after the release of Kanguva on November 14, which saw a lot of negative feedback on the opening day from YouTube reviews.

On Wednesday, the Tamil Nadu Producers Council (TNPC) issued a strong statement requesting theatre owners to ban fans’ interviews by YouTube channels on theatre premises post the first day first shows (FDFS) and cooperate in doing away with this FDFS public review and opinion process completely. (Also read: Kanguva producer’s wife says Disha Patani’s role in film was to ‘look pretty’, deletes comment after backlash)

In a long four-page letter, the Tamil Nadu Producers Council has condemned ‘personal attacks and incitement of hatred in the name of film reviews.’ They said that films like Indian 2, Vettaiyan and Kanguva were highly impacted due to YouTube FDFS public reviews.

What the letter stated

This letter comes after the release of Suriya’s film Kanguva on November 14 which saw a tremendous amount of negative feedback from the audience in the first day first show YouTube reviews and opinion videos. The TNPC wrote that journalists have the right to criticise flaws in the film and talk about the positives and negatives but no one can engage in personal attacks and try to destroy the entire film in their reviews. According to them, this would lead to the downfall of the film industry itself.

The letter also stated, “Critics have every right to review movies. But we request all journalists to write film reviews keeping in mind that hatred towards a film should not be sown in the media because of personal malice. It is imperative that all the associations related to the film industry unite and stop this practice by not encouraging them anymore.”

Advertisement

More details

Kerala was the first state to establish this ban on YouTube reviews. In 2023, Mubeen Rauf, director of Aromalinte Adyathe Pranayam, who was supported by the Producers’ Association filed a case in court to ban YouTube reviewers from theatre premises as their negative public opinion videos were affecting the film business.

The Kerala High Court then issued a directive to the concerned authorities to prevent online reviews of films by social media influencers, YouTube reviewers, and bloggers for seven days following the release of a film.

The court went a step further and even issued notice to the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and the Central Board of Film Certification to establish clear and transparent guidelines for online film critics and vloggers. Producers felt this move would protect the industry.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending