Connect with us

Trending

35% of Uttar Pradesh assembly members face criminal cases

Published

on

35% of Uttar Pradesh assembly members face criminal cases

An analysis by the Association for Democratic Reform (ADR) found that as many as 35% of Uttar Pradesh parliament members face pending criminal cases before the state’s elections to be held next year. 27% of them face serious cases.

ADR analyzed the statements of 369 lawmakers and found that 7 of them had pending murders, 36 attempted murders, and 2 crimes against women. “106 (35%) of the 304 MLAs (members of the Legislative Assembly) from the (ruling) Bharatiya Janata Party (Bharatiya Janata Party) and 18 (37%) of the 49 MLAs from the SP (Samajwadi Party), of which 5 (31%) from 16 MLAs from BSP (Bahujan Samaj Party) and 1 (14%) from 7 MLAs from INC (Congress) declared criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits, “ADR said in a report based on analysis.

Mukhtar Ansari of BSP and Vijay Kumar of Nirbal Indian Shoshit Hamara Aam Dal face 16 criminal cases.

ADR stated that the percentage of judicial assistance facing criminal cases has declined. In 2012, ADR found that out of 403 MLAs, 47% faced them. As many as 313 current lawmakers are crorepatis. BJP has 304 MLAs, of which 235 are crorepatis. SP has 42 crerepatis out of 49 MLAs. The BSP has 15 crorepatis, and the Congress has 5. The richest MLAs of BSP are Guddu Jamali and Vinay Tiwari. Two BJP MLAs and ministers Nand Gopal Nandi and Siddhartha Nath Singh have outstanding loans.

Advertisement

Ajay Kumar Lallu (Parliament) and Dhananjay and Vijay Rajbhar (​​BJP) have the lowest assets. At least 95 lawmakers have dropped out of school, 4 have just learned to read, and 5 have diplomas. At least 206 lawmakers are between 25-50 years old, and 190 lawmakers are between 51 and 80 years old.

News Source : Hindustan Times

Trending

Startups that use excerpts from their own pitch are sent legal notifications by Shark Tank India; the creator responds, “Kaise banega naya India?”

Published

on

By

Startups that use excerpts from their own pitch are sent legal notifications by Shark Tank India; the creator responds, “Kaise banega naya India?”

After getting a legal letter from Sony Pictures for copyright infringement, the subscription-based tea business Dorje Teas found itself in deep water for utilising footage from their own pitch on YouTube and Meta advertisements.

The founders of the subscription-based tea company Dorje Teas, Ishaan Kanoria and Sparsh Agarwal.

While many entrepreneurs, especially those with startups, have found transformation through the business reality TV series Shark Tank India, the narrative is slightly different for Dorje Teas, a subscription-based tea firm that ships organic and fresh-from-the-farm Darjeeling Tea to consumers throughout India. Sony Pictures Networks India slapped the firm with a legal notice, which has placed it in hot water.

Co-founder Sparsh Agarwal of the company, who brought Dorje Teas to Shark Tank India last year and raised funds of Rs 30 lakh for 15% equity from Anupam Mittal, Peyush Bansal, and Vineeta Singh, valued the business at Rs 2 crore, recently revealed on LinkedIn that they received a legal notice from Shark Tank India for utilising snippets of their own pitch.

Agarwal claims that they received a notification about copyright infringement for utilising these clips in YouTube and Meta advertisements. It appears that Sony Pictures has sent notice to other companies besides Dorje Teas. He said, “They’ve clamped down on every single startup that showed up on Shark Tank, so we’re not the only ones.”

Advertisement

“I don’t understand why they would do this, even though I am aware of the copyright rules that justify it. After all, Dorje Teas and several other businesses, like Skippi, Assembly, Perfora, Hoovu Fresh, Beyond Snack, Wakao Foods, Nasher Miles, and many more, invest thousands of dollars each month to enhance Shark Tank content, which helps the Shark Tank India brand get free exposure and increase brand memory,” he continued.

Agarwal went on to call it a poor business choice that some executive or lawyer at Sony had made, adding that it “goes against the entire ethos of promoting small startups.”

Additionally, the focus of Shark Tank Season 3 has been on creating a new India and assisting the startup environment in India. “How will we construct a ‘new India’ in this manner?’” he questioned in a self-recorded video.

On social media, Agarwal was met with praise, while some contended that Sony’s actions were legitimate in theory. “Dear Sparsh, you must realise that ‘You are the content’ in this situation. You play a big part in content production. You posted the material that features you on your social media accounts (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and so on), but not on Sony’s. You might say that the traffic they were supposed to get was somehow redirected to them. A content strategist made the observation, “You are monetizing your social channels with the content they produce.”

Advertisement

“The first person to provide a sneak peek in the content industry attracts greater attention. Furthermore, it’s possible that you agreed to sign a waiver giving them perpetual rights to the footage they shot. They said, “Verify your contract or try to recall signing any electronic documents on the filming locations that make this clear.

“You are investing lakhs of dollars to promote Shark Tank, while Shark Tank is investing billions of dollars to plan and publicise the programme that features your brand.” Simply alter your viewpoint, as another poster pointed out.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

[the_ad id="55117"]

Trending