Connect with us

India Hot Topics

BJP MLA Nitesh Rane moves Bombay HC seeking bail

Published

on

BJP MLA Nitesh Rane moves Bombay HC seeking bail

On Tuesday, a court in Maharashtra’s Sindhudurg district refused bail for BJP MLA Nitesh Rane in connection with attempted murder, saying his application for relief was “premature and unsustainable”.

Additional session judge R B Rote also found the custodial trial of federal minister Narayan Rane’s son Nitesh Rane was necessary because the police investigation into the matter was “incomplete”.

The opposition lawmaker, through his defender Satish Maneshinde, has applied for bail from the Mumbai High Court following the conference court ruling.

His attorney will seek an emergency hearing at HC.

Advertisement

In his High Court bail petition, Nitesh Rane claimed that he was implicated in “a typical case of political vendetta or rivalry under the authority of the ruling against the applicant (Nitesh) and his father.” Further claiming that belonged to Ma People in the opposition party in Harashtra – ruled by a coalition of Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress – and in public office are being “hurt” by the state government by registering false criminal cases.

The attempted murder case, in which MLA was the accused, involved Santosh Parab, a Shiv Sena activist who allegedly attacked Kankavli during the Co-operative Bank election campaign in Sindhudurg district last December.

Last week, in handling Nitesh Rane’s pre-arrest bail request, the Supreme Court had given Maharashtra police 10 days not to arrest him.

The Supreme Court has directed BJP lawmakers to surrender at the Sindhudurg Trial Court, where criminal cases are registered, before seeking regular bail on the matter.

Advertisement

Therefore, the MLA from Kankavli, Sindhudurg district, turned himself in and sought bail before the trial.

Nitesh Rane’s defence, Maneshinde, argued that the Supreme Court allowed his client to turn himself in at the trial court and apply for regular bail.

He said the Supreme Court gave the applicant 10 days of temporary protection from arrest from January 27, and his appearance before the trial amounted to turning himself in.

However, Special Prosecutor Pradeep Gharat argued that the applicant should have been detained before making an application for bail under Section 439 of the CrPC.

Advertisement

Under section 439 of the CrPC, the High Court or the Court of Sessions can grant bail to anyone charged with an offence and detained.

Making a bail application while not in custody amounts to prospective bail and the applicant does not have access to the remedies described above. Therefore, Gharat believes that the bail application is not maintainable.

While rejecting Nitesh Rane’s bail request, the Sessions Court called it “premature”.

Complete News Source – THE TRIBUNE NEWS

Advertisement

Movie

The Madras High Court has granted early screenings of Vijay’s Leo movie from 7 AM, requesting the TN government to resolve any issues.

Published

on

By

The Madras High Court has granted early screenings of Vijay’s Leo movie from 7 AM, requesting the TN government to resolve any issues.

Madras High Court Grants Early Screenings of Vijay’s “Leo” Movie at 7 AM, Urges TN Government to Address Concerns

The Madras High Court has made a landmark decision in favor of the much-anticipated Tamil film “Leo,” starring actor Vijay. In a significant move, the court has granted permission for early screenings of the movie from 7 AM, urging the Tamil Nadu government to swiftly address any issues and facilitate the smooth release of the film. This decision marks a pivotal moment in the realm of Tamil cinema and the entertainment industry at large.

Historical Context:

The Indian film industry, particularly the Tamil film industry, has seen its share of controversies and challenges related to film releases. Issues such as censorship, political disputes, and public sentiment have often played a significant role in shaping the release schedules and screening times for films. Vijay, one of Tamil cinema’s most prominent actors, has been at the center of such controversies in the past. This decision by the Madras High Court is, therefore, particularly noteworthy.

Advertisement

The Ruling:

The Madras High Court’s decision to permit early screenings of “Leo” comes as a response to a plea filed by the film’s producers. The court, while considering the plea, took into account various factors, including the film’s anticipated popularity and the prevailing circumstances. The court emphasized the importance of accommodating the audience’s interests and allowing them to enjoy the film without disruptions.

A Step Towards Normalization:

The court’s decision signifies a positive shift in the film industry, where release dates and screening times are often mired in controversy. By allowing screenings to commence at 7 AM, the court aims to reduce the chances of public unrest and congestion near theaters, especially in the wake of high-profile film releases.

Advertisement

The Role of the Tamil Nadu Government:

The Madras High Court, in its ruling, also called upon the Tamil Nadu government to cooperate in ensuring a seamless release for the film. This cooperation extends to providing necessary security measures to maintain law and order around theaters during the early screenings.

Implications for the Entertainment Industry:

The decision is expected to set a precedent for the release of other highly anticipated films, not just in Tamil cinema but also in the broader Indian film industry. The court’s emphasis on the importance of accommodating the audience’s interests could lead to more flexible screening times for movies in the future.

Advertisement

The Audience’s Perspective:

For moviegoers and fans of Vijay, this decision comes as a welcome relief. They can now look forward to enjoying the film without any undue delays or disruptions, ensuring a memorable cinematic experience.

In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s ruling to allow early screenings of Vijay’s “Leo” at 7 AM while urging the Tamil Nadu government to resolve any issues paves the way for a more audience-centric approach in the film industry. It is a landmark decision that highlights the importance of balancing the interests of filmmakers and the movie-loving public. This judgment is poised to make a positive impact on the release of future films, ushering in a new era of flexibility and convenience for cinema enthusiasts.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

[the_ad id="55117"]

Trending