Connect with us

Web Series

Indian Matchmaking’s “Sima aunty” is made fun of by Vir Das: Indian parents will…

Published

on

Indian Matchmaking’s “Sima aunty” is made fun of by Vir Das: Indian parents will…

Sima Taparia, also known as “Sima aunty” on the show Indian Matchmaking, was featured in a post by actor and comedian Vir Das. Indian matchmaker Sima frequently informs her customers that she will only be able to meet 60–70% of their needs when locating their life spouse. Vir made light of this by joking that parents in India would murder their children if they achieved this exam score.

“Indian parents will literally kill you if you earn 60 percent till you meet Sima aunty,” stated Vir in an Instagram post. That is the best you can do, then. Sumona Chakravarti, an actor, and Anaita Shroff, a stylist, both added laughing emojis to his message. And even then, Sima Aunty has a 0% success rate, one fan wrote. Another one wrote, “100% kisiko milta nahi hai (Nobody gets a 100%)” after quoting Sima’s words from the program.

For the perplexed audience, Sima aunty is the Karen of Brown Households, wrote another person in jest. Another person added, “I only paid Sima aunty 60% of the agreed broker costs. Because 60 to 70% is the maximum you can hope for. One recalled a recent encounter with Sima and exclaimed, “Oh my God, it was hilarious when we ran across Sima aunty on a recent trip to Canada.”

Sima Taparia, a matchmaker based in Mumbai, was introduced in the first season of Indian Matchmaking, which debuted on Netflix in 2020. Sima Taparia works to match men and women who want to be married based on their individual expectations, backgrounds, and social standing.

Advertisement

On the program, Sima said that the age difference between Nick Jonas and Priyanka Chopra makes them an unsuitable couple. She later admitted in an interview that Dharmendra and Hema Malini and Anushka Sharma are her ideal husband and wife.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Legal and Laws News Platforms – https://legalmatters.in/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in/

Continue Reading

Web Series

Review of House of the Dragon Season 2 Episode 1: A solid, albeit sluggish, comeback with more discussion and less action

Published

on

By

Review of House of the Dragon Season 2 Episode 1: A solid, albeit sluggish, comeback with more discussion and less action

There are high hopes for House of the Dragon’s nearly two-year return. The first season of the prequel series to Game of Thrones raised the bar by placing viewers squarely in the thick of action and including rich character development spanning about 20 years in the Dance of the Dragons. The second season picks up just after the horrific events of the first, in which Prince Aemond Targaryen (Ewan Mitchell) and his dragon killed Rhaenyra Targaryen’s (Emma D’Arcy) youngest son, Lucerys (Elliot Mitchell). Now, intent or lack thereof is irrelevant. There’s been bloodshed, and the fallout will be far bloodier.

Fans of Game of Thrones may be reminded of the strategic war table scenes in which the protagonists scheme and plot in poorly lit interiors and consult council to choose the best course of action in the first episode of the second season, “A Son for a Son.” This time around, viewers should anticipate a more engaging comeback if the first episode is any guide. To be honest, it’s a pleasant diversion from the previous season’s unrelenting presentation of the developing conflict between the Blacks and the Greens. This season seems to be taking a much more methodical approach, focusing primarily on the internal conflicts. Peace is undoubtedly unattainable, but in the pursuit  for revenge, what also meets the eye is the reclamation of power, and the expression of grief.

Emma D’Arcy is fierce from the moment they first appear, adding a hint of melancholy and sorrow to the cunning world of things. However, Daemon (Matt Smith) is not to be trusted because he has his own ideas about who will succeed him. He doesn’t understand why pursuing retribution must wait when it may be completed right away. He reasons, “The mother grieves as the queen shirks her duties.” Additionally, Alicent (Olivia Cooke) and her daughter Helaena (Phia Saban) need to go beyond being remorseful spectators. By the end of this grim tale, we realise exactly why Helaena says she is afraid of rats.

The first episode immerses viewers in the discussions and betrayals that take place in the council chambers and chambers. It takes a confident and poised stride towards intensifying hostilities. While some viewers may be taken aback by showrunner Ryan Condal’s approach, which emphasises character-driven intrigue over grand schemes and spectacular action scenes in the beginning of the season, the show delves deeply into themes of war, betrayal, and legacy. We do get a deeper look at the hopelessness and inner demons of these men who pleasure in killing and retaliation, which makes the first episode promising even though it is a little too inconsistent and constrained for its own benefit. Even now, the first episode is personal and moving, laying  the necessary groundwork for the battles that will inevitably follow as the season develops.

Advertisement

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending