Connect with us

Entertainment

Tanishaa Mukerji: I most probably got Covid when I removed my mask for pictures

Published

on

Tanishaa Mukerji: I most probably got Covid when I removed my mask for pictures

Actor Tanishaa Mukerji is recovering after testing positive for Covid-19. “Thank God, I did a great job. I was fully vaccinated, which is why my symptoms are not that severe, and I am not that severe,” Mukerji shared with us, adding that her symptoms mainly include congestion and only fever. For a day.

Last week, the actor shared her health status on Instagram and revealed that she had self-quarantined after being diagnosed. The 43-year-old lady tried to piece together her exposure to the virus, “I recently went out to a public party. Although I was wearing a mask, I had to take it off in order to take pictures and interact. I think I was that night. It may have been infected.”

Although the vaccine can help her fight the virus, she was still infected despite all preventive measures, which made her realize the importance of being careful every step of the way.

“The new coronavirus has come out. It is now part of our environment, and I think we will overcome it like polio or the plague,” she mentioned, emphasizing that until then, we cannot relax our vigilance. In fact, she didn’t let the news of the new variant Omicron bother her. She said: “I won’t be anxious about any new variants, because knowing the information correctly can help us overcome any difficulties.”

Advertisement

The actor added: “I just want people to understand that even if you are vaccinated, you may still be infected. Once the virus tests positive, please isolate and take precautions, because this is not just a problem for one person. We need Be careful not to infect other people. You never know what their previous condition may be, and exposure to the virus may cause real harm to them.”

Since she thinks she was infected when she went out to a public party because of work, would she hesitate to face the camera without wearing a mask after recovery?

“Since I contracted the virus, I will be safe for a few months, and the world is quickly looking for ways to improve recovery after infection, so I fully believe that our body will also adapt to fighting this virus,” she told us.

When talking about the extra precautions she intends to take after returning to work, Mukerji asserted that “the idea is to always stay awake in public gatherings”.

Advertisement

“And wear a mask (when not in front of the camera), don’t touch my face and wash my hands regularly,” she concluded.

News Source : Hindustan Times

Cricket

KL Rahul dangerously close to Laxman territory; to be perished for Sarfaraz Khan and Shubman Gill

Published

on

By

KL Rahul dangerously close to Laxman territory; to be perished for Sarfaraz Khan and Shubman Gill

To accommodate both Sarfaraz and Gill and stick with their five-bowler formula, a batter from the Bengaluru Test must make way. Ergo Rahul and the predicted axe

VVS Laxman went through the first half of his illustrious 15-and-a-half-year international career with the proverbial axe hanging over him. Despite his magical stroke-play and a well-founded reputation for rallying the lower order to bat above itself, he was forever the first name that sprang to the decision-makers’ minds when they had to drop someone to accommodate someone else. It wasn’t until the second half of his stint with the national team that he had ‘job security’, which automatically manifested itself in an array of glorious, match-turning knocks and earmarked him as one for a crisis.

KL Rahul is now dangerously close to approaching the Laxman territory, though at least in this instance, a case can be made out, perhaps, for why he often seems to be playing for his place. Almost a decade after his Test debut in Australia in December 2014, he has yet to nail down a permanent spot, a result of glaring inconsistency and repeated dalliances with injuries that have left him with a modest average of 33.87 from 53 Test appearances.

Unlike Laxman, who was thrust to the opener’s position for three years from 1997, successive team managements have worked overtime to create space for Rahul. He started off in the middle order in Melbourne against Australia, opened in the next Test in Sydney when he made a sparkling century, continued in that position for a good nine years – around the large pockets when either injuries or lack of form relegated him to the sidelines – and now seems to have found his calling in the middle order, where he was tried out in an almost last throw of the dice in South Africa last December.

Advertisement

In his limited time at the No. 6 position, Rahul has been a revelation. On a spiteful surface in Centurion in his first innings back in the middle order, the classy right-hander made a marvellous 101 – Virat Kohli’s 38 was the next highest score – in India’s 245 all out. Two Tests later, against England in Hyderabad, he waltzed to 86 of the best until a hamstring strain kept him out of the last four Tests.

On his comeback last month against Bangladesh, Rahul showed why he is rated so highly, and therefore why he so frustrates when he chooses to shackle himself mentally, with uninhibited shot-making when India were pressing for a declaration (Chennai) and looking to make up for lost time with a frenetic batting approach (Kanpur) in the two Tests. Kanpur was especially mesmeric, 68 flowing off his bat in a mere 43 deliveries. It was the best of Rahul.

Axe hangs over Rahul’s head for India vs New Zealand 2nd Test

And yet here we are, two innings later, wondering whether he will, or should, feature in the playing XI in Pune, where India take on New Zealand in a must-win second Test from Thursday.

Shubman Gill, him of three centuries in his last six Tests, missed the Bengaluru defeat to the Kiwis with a stiff neck. Replacement batter Sarfaraz Khan made the most of own good fortune with a delectable 150, which makes it near impossible to drop him now that Gill is fully fit. To accommodate both Sarfaraz and Gill and stick with their five-bowler formula which has worked beautifully in the last few years, a batter from the Bengaluru Test must make way. Ergo Rahul and the predicted axe.

Advertisement

One of the few men to have led India in all three formats internationally, Rahul didn’t help his cause with scores of 0 and 12 at his home ground, the M Chinnaswamy Stadium. In the first innings, he was strangled down leg-side by William O’Rourke while in the second, he received a peach from the same paceman operating with the second new ball and was again caught behind. Rahul was one of 11 failures in India’s first-innings 46 and one of seven wickets to fall in 93 deliveries to the second new cherry, but failures past and the logjam created by Gill’s availability have combined to identify him as the most susceptible to the axe.

It’s a cross impossible to bear, but also impossible to ignore just because it is so heavy, so overarching. Rahul is beyond gifted and makes batting appear oh-so-simple, but his struggles to embrace sustained run-making can’t be wished away. He is the eternal team man, much like his celebrated namesake also from Karnataka – both kept wickets admirably in 50-over World Cups 21 years apart, both made attractive and impactful runs during the tournament and both tasted bitter defeat at the hands of Australia in the final – but ‘eternal team man’ can sometimes be an euphemism for the ‘most dispensable’ and Rahul can be excused for thinking that those two lines have blurred beyond repair. Of course, if he is brutally honest to himself, he will acknowledge at least to himself that he too must bear culpability for the blurring of the lines.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending