Connect with us

Movies Reviews

The White Tiger Movie Review

Published

on

The White Tiger Movie Review

The White Tiger is a movie based on the same-named 2008 book by Aravind Adiga. The caste politics and the rich-poor gap in India are both topics covered in the movie. It provides a reflection on what’s wrong with our nation, where the powerful continue dominate those with less money despite having a long history of democracy. The only path up for the poor, according to the somewhat skewed perspective of the movie, is through crime and politics. The movie was created by Ramin Bahrani with Western audiences in mind. So all we see is extreme poverty on the one hand and high society living on the other. It seems as though the enormous Indian middle class, whose purchasing power propels the global economy ahead, doesn’t actually exist.

Balram Halwai (Adash Gourav), who has some education and can speak Hindi, is on one end of the spectrum and wants to be Ashok’s (Rajkummar Rao), the younger son of the village zamindar (Mahesh Manjrekar). Ashok, an Indian man who studied there, is married to Pinky (Priyanka Chopra), an American-born Indian woman. The only people who treat Balram like a human being are America-returned Ashok and Pinky, whilst the zamindar and his older son (Vijay Maurya) treat him like he is only a step above being an animal. The only true humanitarian in the movie is Pinky. She constantly prods him to resist and refuse to accept things as they are.

Pinky also admitted to running down a youngster while intoxicated. Balram is made to take responsibility for a crime. Does it resemble a well-known hit-and-run incident from Mumbai? His inability to say no drives him to rebel against the invisible restraints that surround him, which results in a night of crime and rebellion but ultimately results in his redemption.

The script contains many inconsistencies. We don’t sure why Ashok is portrayed conducting too many transactions in Delhi, much against his will. A picture of his father and sibling on a train in the sleeping car. Once more, this reeks of stupidity because no wealthy person would do that.

Advertisement

The fact that the common guy, the drivers, and Balram’s relatives are seen conversing in English among themselves may be the most annoying aspect. Now, a driver may communicate in English with his bosses, but he will not do so with his coworkers. Additionally, when did the Pajero surpass all other luxury vehicles among the wealthy in Delhi?

The class, caste, and religion divisions are only hinted to in the movie, as was previously said. Barking but not biting, it. Maybe the director doesn’t know much about India; after all, Adiga’s book is only a point of reference. Or maybe he was told not to look too deeply. Whatever the cause, it leaves you feeling unfulfilled.

The excellent acting helps to make up for the lack of depth. As Pinky, who openly rebels against her in-laws’ patriarchal norms since she isn’t used to them, Priyanka Chopra gives a fantastic performance. She accurately captured their casual misbehaviour with the maids in her reaction photos. Her chemistry with Rajkummar Rao is also electrifying. They resemble a yuppie couple who don’t quite fit in and should return to the United States. Although it’s not Pinky’s narrative, we wish there had been more of Priyanka in the movie. In his part as the younger son who has forgotten that his family is essentially a band of thugs, Rajkummar Rao also comes off as very natural. He is torn between two opposing poles and is unsure of his place in either.

Rao brilliantly conveys the hopelessness of his character. However, Adarsh Gourav is solely responsible for the movie. He personifies Balram. He performs so naturally that it’s easy to forget you’re seeing an actor. It seems like someone is being followed around by a candid camera that somehow has access to their innermost thoughts.

Advertisement

We’ll stress that The White Tiger was created with a Western audience in mind and that it contributes to the myth that India is a destitute, third-world nation. Thankfully, the human drama it presents transcends clichés.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Legal and Laws News Platforms – https://legalmatters.in/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in/

Tollywood

Post Kanguva debacle, Tamil Nadu producers demand ban of YouTube channels from theatres

Published

on

By

Post Kanguva debacle, Tamil Nadu producers demand ban of YouTube channels from theatres

This decision comes after the release of Kanguva on November 14, which saw a lot of negative feedback on the opening day from YouTube reviews.

On Wednesday, the Tamil Nadu Producers Council (TNPC) issued a strong statement requesting theatre owners to ban fans’ interviews by YouTube channels on theatre premises post the first day first shows (FDFS) and cooperate in doing away with this FDFS public review and opinion process completely. (Also read: Kanguva producer’s wife says Disha Patani’s role in film was to ‘look pretty’, deletes comment after backlash)

In a long four-page letter, the Tamil Nadu Producers Council has condemned ‘personal attacks and incitement of hatred in the name of film reviews.’ They said that films like Indian 2, Vettaiyan and Kanguva were highly impacted due to YouTube FDFS public reviews.

What the letter stated

This letter comes after the release of Suriya’s film Kanguva on November 14 which saw a tremendous amount of negative feedback from the audience in the first day first show YouTube reviews and opinion videos. The TNPC wrote that journalists have the right to criticise flaws in the film and talk about the positives and negatives but no one can engage in personal attacks and try to destroy the entire film in their reviews. According to them, this would lead to the downfall of the film industry itself.

The letter also stated, “Critics have every right to review movies. But we request all journalists to write film reviews keeping in mind that hatred towards a film should not be sown in the media because of personal malice. It is imperative that all the associations related to the film industry unite and stop this practice by not encouraging them anymore.”

Advertisement

More details

Kerala was the first state to establish this ban on YouTube reviews. In 2023, Mubeen Rauf, director of Aromalinte Adyathe Pranayam, who was supported by the Producers’ Association filed a case in court to ban YouTube reviewers from theatre premises as their negative public opinion videos were affecting the film business.

The Kerala High Court then issued a directive to the concerned authorities to prevent online reviews of films by social media influencers, YouTube reviewers, and bloggers for seven days following the release of a film.

The court went a step further and even issued notice to the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and the Central Board of Film Certification to establish clear and transparent guidelines for online film critics and vloggers. Producers felt this move would protect the industry.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending