Connect with us

Trending

Supreme Court clarifies it never asked Delhi government to shut schools

Published

on

Supreme Court clarifies it never asked Delhi government to shut schools

One day after the Delhi government suspended physical education classes in capital schools due to increasing pollution levels, the Supreme Court clarified on Friday that it did not ask the government to close schools. While continuing to hear the case, the Chief Justice of India said that it only asked about the reasons behind the change in the government’s position. On Thursday, the Supreme Court gave the Delhi government a 24-hour deadline to take specific measures to deal with pollution. As the government listed its decisions, including the suspension of physical education classes, the Supreme Court approved the Delhi government’s hospital construction project. Students work at home while resuming physical education for school children, exposing them to the threat of dangerous pollution.

As the Delhi government notified the court on Thursday that schooling is voluntary and online courses are also in progress, the court observed that if there is a choice, people will send their children to school. Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, Delhi’s Environment Minister Gopal Rai announced that physical education classes will be suspended indefinitely from Friday until further notice. The minister also stated that according to the pollution situation in the capital at that time, physical education classes will resume on November 29. On Friday, Abhishek Singhvi, an advocate representing the Delhi government, submitted a statement to the court that the school had been closed. He also added that the physical education class only lasted 17 days in November.

CJI stated that some media sections view the Supreme Court as a villain. “We have observed that, not knowing whether it was intentional or unintentional, some media tried to project us as villains, and we wanted to close the school. You said that we were closing the school and introduced working from home. Read the newspaper today!” CJI said.

In addition to CJI’s comments, Singhvi also said that a newspaper reported on the hearing as if it were conducted in an administrative struggle.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court was informed that the Air Quality Management Committee has established an enforcement task force to monitor compliance with pollution directives. The committee informed the court that it had formed 17 flying teams, took punitive actions against violators, and would increase the number to 40 in the next 24 hours.

News Source : Hindustan Times

Trending

Startups that use excerpts from their own pitch are sent legal notifications by Shark Tank India; the creator responds, “Kaise banega naya India?”

Published

on

By

Startups that use excerpts from their own pitch are sent legal notifications by Shark Tank India; the creator responds, “Kaise banega naya India?”

After getting a legal letter from Sony Pictures for copyright infringement, the subscription-based tea business Dorje Teas found itself in deep water for utilising footage from their own pitch on YouTube and Meta advertisements.

The founders of the subscription-based tea company Dorje Teas, Ishaan Kanoria and Sparsh Agarwal.

While many entrepreneurs, especially those with startups, have found transformation through the business reality TV series Shark Tank India, the narrative is slightly different for Dorje Teas, a subscription-based tea firm that ships organic and fresh-from-the-farm Darjeeling Tea to consumers throughout India. Sony Pictures Networks India slapped the firm with a legal notice, which has placed it in hot water.

Co-founder Sparsh Agarwal of the company, who brought Dorje Teas to Shark Tank India last year and raised funds of Rs 30 lakh for 15% equity from Anupam Mittal, Peyush Bansal, and Vineeta Singh, valued the business at Rs 2 crore, recently revealed on LinkedIn that they received a legal notice from Shark Tank India for utilising snippets of their own pitch.

Agarwal claims that they received a notification about copyright infringement for utilising these clips in YouTube and Meta advertisements. It appears that Sony Pictures has sent notice to other companies besides Dorje Teas. He said, “They’ve clamped down on every single startup that showed up on Shark Tank, so we’re not the only ones.”

Advertisement

“I don’t understand why they would do this, even though I am aware of the copyright rules that justify it. After all, Dorje Teas and several other businesses, like Skippi, Assembly, Perfora, Hoovu Fresh, Beyond Snack, Wakao Foods, Nasher Miles, and many more, invest thousands of dollars each month to enhance Shark Tank content, which helps the Shark Tank India brand get free exposure and increase brand memory,” he continued.

Agarwal went on to call it a poor business choice that some executive or lawyer at Sony had made, adding that it “goes against the entire ethos of promoting small startups.”

Additionally, the focus of Shark Tank Season 3 has been on creating a new India and assisting the startup environment in India. “How will we construct a ‘new India’ in this manner?’” he questioned in a self-recorded video.

On social media, Agarwal was met with praise, while some contended that Sony’s actions were legitimate in theory. “Dear Sparsh, you must realise that ‘You are the content’ in this situation. You play a big part in content production. You posted the material that features you on your social media accounts (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and so on), but not on Sony’s. You might say that the traffic they were supposed to get was somehow redirected to them. A content strategist made the observation, “You are monetizing your social channels with the content they produce.”

Advertisement

“The first person to provide a sneak peek in the content industry attracts greater attention. Furthermore, it’s possible that you agreed to sign a waiver giving them perpetual rights to the footage they shot. They said, “Verify your contract or try to recall signing any electronic documents on the filming locations that make this clear.

“You are investing lakhs of dollars to promote Shark Tank, while Shark Tank is investing billions of dollars to plan and publicise the programme that features your brand.” Simply alter your viewpoint, as another poster pointed out.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending