Connect with us

Trending

Landmark decision: Calcutta HC allows woman to terminate 35-week pregnancy

Published

on

Landmark decision: Calcutta HC allows woman to terminate 35-week pregnancy

KOLKATA: In a landmark decision, the Kolkata Supreme Court on Thursday allowed a woman to terminate her pregnancy at 35 weeks after doctors discovered defects in the fetus’ spinal cord and brain that gave it a slim chance of survival.

A nine-member medical panel made up of a Supreme Court order has recommended that if a child is allowed to be born with an open spinal cord defect with a brain malformation, he will need immediate spinal surgery and shunt surgery to enlarge the head.

Doctors have observed that even after surgery, babies can develop serious physical, neurological and developmental problems, such as quadriplegia, loss of bowel and bladder control, convulsions, cognitive delay and vision problems.

“In view of all the facts and circumstances, this court authorizes the petitioner to perform medical termination of the pregnancy in a licensed hospital or medical facility,” the Supreme Court order said.

Advertisement

A single-judge committee, Rajasekhar Mantha, made its decision while hearing a lawsuit by a 36-year-old woman to seek medical termination of her pregnancy on the grounds that at least three doctors had identified multiple medical complications of the fetus. It also affects the health of petitioners.

The bank instructed the director of the Graduate Medical Education and Research Institute of Calcutta to form a medical committee under the terms of the Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971 and to give an opinion in court. The report was submitted earlier this week.

The couple – the petitioner and her husband – also checked the medical report and then swore that they intended to medically terminate the pregnancy. The petitioner also informed the court that she was aware of the medical consequences.

“The risks and consequences of such a procedure for the applicant, i. H. abortion at this stage, have also been made clear, and the petitioner and her husband have carefully considered and accepted such risks. See Come, the petitioner’s life is not seriously threatened,” the order said.

Advertisement

The court continued that cases of this nature must be fact-based, as they depend on the nature of the medical association report and the necessary consent under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971.

In October 2021, the Center notified the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Rules, 2021, to extend the gestation period from 20 to 24 weeks for certain categories of women to terminate a pregnancy.

Complete News Source : Hindustan Times

Advertisement

Trending

Startups that use excerpts from their own pitch are sent legal notifications by Shark Tank India; the creator responds, “Kaise banega naya India?”

Published

on

By

Startups that use excerpts from their own pitch are sent legal notifications by Shark Tank India; the creator responds, “Kaise banega naya India?”

After getting a legal letter from Sony Pictures for copyright infringement, the subscription-based tea business Dorje Teas found itself in deep water for utilising footage from their own pitch on YouTube and Meta advertisements.

The founders of the subscription-based tea company Dorje Teas, Ishaan Kanoria and Sparsh Agarwal.

While many entrepreneurs, especially those with startups, have found transformation through the business reality TV series Shark Tank India, the narrative is slightly different for Dorje Teas, a subscription-based tea firm that ships organic and fresh-from-the-farm Darjeeling Tea to consumers throughout India. Sony Pictures Networks India slapped the firm with a legal notice, which has placed it in hot water.

Co-founder Sparsh Agarwal of the company, who brought Dorje Teas to Shark Tank India last year and raised funds of Rs 30 lakh for 15% equity from Anupam Mittal, Peyush Bansal, and Vineeta Singh, valued the business at Rs 2 crore, recently revealed on LinkedIn that they received a legal notice from Shark Tank India for utilising snippets of their own pitch.

Agarwal claims that they received a notification about copyright infringement for utilising these clips in YouTube and Meta advertisements. It appears that Sony Pictures has sent notice to other companies besides Dorje Teas. He said, “They’ve clamped down on every single startup that showed up on Shark Tank, so we’re not the only ones.”

Advertisement

“I don’t understand why they would do this, even though I am aware of the copyright rules that justify it. After all, Dorje Teas and several other businesses, like Skippi, Assembly, Perfora, Hoovu Fresh, Beyond Snack, Wakao Foods, Nasher Miles, and many more, invest thousands of dollars each month to enhance Shark Tank content, which helps the Shark Tank India brand get free exposure and increase brand memory,” he continued.

Agarwal went on to call it a poor business choice that some executive or lawyer at Sony had made, adding that it “goes against the entire ethos of promoting small startups.”

Additionally, the focus of Shark Tank Season 3 has been on creating a new India and assisting the startup environment in India. “How will we construct a ‘new India’ in this manner?’” he questioned in a self-recorded video.

On social media, Agarwal was met with praise, while some contended that Sony’s actions were legitimate in theory. “Dear Sparsh, you must realise that ‘You are the content’ in this situation. You play a big part in content production. You posted the material that features you on your social media accounts (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and so on), but not on Sony’s. You might say that the traffic they were supposed to get was somehow redirected to them. A content strategist made the observation, “You are monetizing your social channels with the content they produce.”

Advertisement

“The first person to provide a sneak peek in the content industry attracts greater attention. Furthermore, it’s possible that you agreed to sign a waiver giving them perpetual rights to the footage they shot. They said, “Verify your contract or try to recall signing any electronic documents on the filming locations that make this clear.

“You are investing lakhs of dollars to promote Shark Tank, while Shark Tank is investing billions of dollars to plan and publicise the programme that features your brand.” Simply alter your viewpoint, as another poster pointed out.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in      
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Anyskill-ads

Facebook

Trending