health and remedies
Study finds antibiotics after birth affects gut microbes of babies
Treating newborns with antibiotics is associated with fewer healthy bacteria needed to digest milk, a new study finds.
The results were published in the journal Nature Communications.
Clinicians should consider using antibiotics in a way that causes the least damage to the newborn’s microbiome, the community of microbes that live in our bodies, experts say.
According to current guidelines, between 4% and 10% of all newborns with suspected infection are currently prescribed antibiotics that target multiple bacteria — so-called broad-spectrum antibiotics.
However, experts say antibiotic prescriptions are unnecessary in most cases because only a small percentage of people who receive the drugs end up being diagnosed with the infection.
This overprescribing is designed to ensure early treatment for those who are eventually found to be infected, as any delay could quickly become life-threatening.
Researchers from the Universities of Edinburgh and Birmingham, Spaarne Hospital and Utrecht University Hospital in the Netherlands conducted a clinical study involving 227 infants to analyse how antibiotics affect the newborn’s microbiome.
About 147 infants with suspected sepsis received one of three standard antibiotic regimens. Their results were compared with those of 80 infants who had no suspected infection and who were not taking antibiotics.
Rectal or stool samples were collected from all infants before and after treatment and at 1, 4, and 12 months of age. The microbes that make up the newly formed microbiome and bacterial genes associated with antibiotic resistance in the samples were analyzed.
Significantly lower levels of various bifidobacteria were found in neonates prescribed antibiotics compared with infants who did not receive antibiotics.
These microbes help digest human breast milk and promote gut health, while supporting the immune system to fight infection.
The team also found an increase in the number and abundance of potentially disease-causing bacteria and genes associated with antimicrobial resistance in people treated with antibiotics.
After treatment, 251 of the 695 different bacteria examined changed, thereby altering the balance between good and bad bacteria in favor of potentially more harmful microbes.
Although they recovered over time, the changes in the microbiome and antimicrobial resistance genes persisted for at least 12 months and did not improve with breastfeeding, which is known to support infants’ immune systems.
Professor Debbie Bogart, Chair of Paediatric Medicine at the University of Edinburgh and head of the study, said: “We were surprised by the magnitude and duration of the effect of broad-spectrum antibiotics on the infant microbiome compared to the effect of the same antibiotic on the infant microbiome. The adult microbiome. This may be because antibiotic treatment occurs when infants are just getting their first microbes from their mothers and have yet to develop a resilient microbiome.”
Of the three antibiotic regimens tested, the combination of penicillin and gentamicin had the least adverse effect on the infant gut microbiome and the number of emerging antimicrobial resistance genes.
The researchers concluded that this particular combination of antibiotics is best used to treat suspected infections in newborns.
Dr Marlies van Houten, a paediatrician at Spaarne Hospital in the Netherlands and co-principal investigator of the study, said: “The fact that the initiation of antibiotic treatment appears to be the cause of the microbiome damage, rather than the duration, underscores our need for better biomarkers. or biological predictors to more accurately determine which children will develop an infection, and therefore require antibiotics, and which will not.”
Professor Willem van Schaik, Professor of Microbiology and Infections at the University of Birmingham, said: “It is particularly concerning that we observed two important multidrug-resistant strains of Klebsiella and Enterococcus in neonates treated with antibiotics. Drug pathogens have increased substantially.
“This underlines the importance of further studies into balancing the need and effectiveness of these antibiotics and the risk of the emergence of genes linked with resistance. There may also be scope to develop new interventions, like live biotherapeutics – a treatment that is produced by or involving living cells – to effectively restore the composition of the infant gut microbiome after antibiotic therapy.”
Complete News Source : HINDUSTAN TIMES
health and remedies
Train smarter, not harder: How taking occasional breaks from gym can revolutionise your fitness routine
Taking regular breaks from intense training, like deload weeks, helps your body recover, preventing fatigue and injury, and ultimately boosts fitness gains.
When it comes to getting fit, the idea of spending hours at the gym might come to mind, but many fitness experts argue that taking a “deload week” every six to eight weeks is actually key to improving your fitness gains. A deload week involves reducing the intensity of workouts to allow the body to recover from the fatigue and muscle damage caused by intense training.
While high-intensity training helps build strength and fitness, it can also lead to muscle strain, and without adequate recovery, these gains can’t fully materialise. Deload weeks give the body much-needed rest to repair and rebuild, ensuring continued progress. (Also read: Bhagyashree swears by this super easy exercise for instant leg pain relief and better mobility. Watch how to do it )
Why recovery is key for muscle growth
According to an article by The Conversation, intense exercise can cause tiny tears in muscle fibres, leading to inflammation that requires rest or low-intensity exercise to heal. This inflammation is essential for muscle growth and fitness improvements. However, without proper recovery, muscles remain in a state of slight damage, preventing inflammation from resolving. This chronic state of inflammation can hinder muscle function, reducing oxygen efficiency and impairing performance. Giving muscles time to recover through rest ensures they repair properly and are primed for continued progress, setting us up for greater success in our fitness journey.
Many gymgoers fear taking time off and are worried it will lead to a loss of gains. However, research shows that muscle genes have a “memory imprint,” which keeps them in a semi-prepared state. This allows muscles to respond more quickly and effectively to future training, promoting growth after a rest period. Even after extended periods of reduced intensity, up to seven weeks, muscular fitness can be restored to prime condition—and in some cases, surpass previous levels. Interestingly, recovery can occur twice as fast as it took to reach peak fitness initially, even if some strength is lost.
Taking time off from intense training is crucial to prevent muscle soreness and avoid overtraining syndrome. Overtraining occurs when the body doesn’t get enough rest, leading to prolonged fatigue, decreased performance, and mood disturbances. Symptoms develop gradually, making overtraining difficult to recognize until it’s severe. Rest is essential to avoid these issues and ensure long-term progress in training.
Role of overtraining syndrome and deload weeks
Overtraining syndrome is challenging to quantify due to its vague symptoms. Studies suggest it may affect as few as 10% of elite athletes, though rates could climb to 60% among highly competitive individuals. Recovery is essential for both fitness and overall health. When engaging in heavy gym routines, it’s vital to incorporate sufficient recovery time into your workout plan. Unlike rest days, which involve little to no exercise once or twice a week, deload weeks feature lighter training at reduced intensity—typically about 50% fewer workouts or a 20% drop in workout intensity.
Both rest days and deload weeks are essential for recovery and crucial to improving fitness. It’s not about choosing one over the other—they complement each other. For instance, intense training for marathons, Ironman, or CrossFit competitions requires weekly rest days alongside scheduled deload weeks. However, for recreational gym-goers exercising 1–3 times weekly at a moderate intensity, the recovery from this routine is often sufficient without the need for additional deload weeks.
Fitness influencers recommend incorporating deload weeks into training schedules every 4–8 weeks, aligning closely with the expert advice of 4–6 weeks. However, it’s crucial to listen to your body and schedule deload weeks as needed. If your performance plateaus or worsens, it may signal time for a deload. Training plans should be flexible enough to allow rest when required. Deload weeks not only enhance performance but also support overall health.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.
Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
-
india1 month ago
‘My support will be with new J&K govt’: L-G Manoj Sinha ahead of Omar Abdullah’s oath-taking ceremony
-
Politics1 month ago
New BJP government to take oath in Haryana on Oct 17, PM Modi to attend
-
Sports1 month ago
Score for the third day of the first test between India and New Zealand: Ravindra-Southee crushes IND, NZ leads by 299 at lunch
-
TV1 month ago
Prince Narula and Yuvika Chaudhary share first pic with newborn daughter from hospital. See post
-
In News2 weeks ago
SpiceJet announces 8 new flights to connect Jaipur with Varanasi, Amritsar and Ahmedabad
-
Business2 weeks ago
OpenAI buys new domain chat.com for over $15 million, it redirects to ChatGPT
-
Entertainment.1 month ago
Massive data breach at Game Freak studios reveals shocking new dark Pokemon movie plot
-
Sports1 month ago
India vs New Zealand LIVE Score 1st Test Day 3: Ravindra-Southee carnage flattens IND, NZ lead by 299 at Lunch